ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Occupational Health and Safety
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1641654
This article is part of the Research TopicEvaluating Organizational Health Culture: Tools and Impact on Workplace Health InterventionsView all 12 articles
Workplace harassment is associated with differences in personality traits, coping strategies and work ability: cross sectional study among healthcare professionals
Provisionally accepted
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences, Morphological and Functional Imaging, Section of Occupational Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Workplace Harassment (WPH) in the healthcare sector remains a critical global issue, adversely affecting employees’ psychological well-being and work ability. Aim: This study investigated gender differences, variations in personality traits and coping strategies linked to WPH, and the impact of these dynamics on work performance of healthcare workers (HCW). Methods: A cross-sectional survey was administered to a sample of 415 HCW (138 men and 277 women), including physicians, nurses, and other staff members (e.g., administrative, technical, and auxiliary personnel). Participants completed a series of standardized instruments: WPH and Health Survey Questionnaire (WHHSQ), Mini International Personality Item Pool (Mini-IPIP), Brief-COPE inventory, and Work Ability Index (WAI). Results: Reports of WPH within the past 12 months showed a significantly higher prevalence among women (36.2%, n=94) compared to men (23.3%, n=31), p<0.01. Verbal abuse (30.4%) and bullying/mobbing (17.1%) were the most common forms, with supervisors implicated in about 10-15% of cases. Informal handling, such as confiding in colleagues or family (20-30%), was far more frequent than formal reporting (8-10%). Females scored higher in Agreeableness (M=16.26vs.15.29,p<0.001) and Conscientiousness (M=15.03vs.14.01, p<0.001) but lower in Neuroticism (M=11.56vs.12.93,p<0.0001) compared to males. Individuals who experienced harassment, exhibited lower Neuroticism (mean=11.28vs.12.37,p<0.0001) than non-harassed peers. Coping patterns varied: women reported greater use of Seeking Social Support strategies (M=17.80 vs. 16.02,p<0.0001), while harassed individuals relied more on Avoidance strategies (M=19.15 vs. 18.16,p <0.05), including self-distraction and substance use. Men had higher work ability scores than women (χ²=8.799,p<0.05), while WPH was linked to a significant reduction in work ability (χ²=15.729,p<0.01). Conclusions: Women are likely to face higher WPH rates and tend to seek social support more frequently, while harassed individuals, regardless of gender, increasingly rely on avoidance coping. Exposure to WPH is associated with decreased work ability. Low rate of formal reporting reveals systemic gaps in institutional responses. To address these challenges, healthcare organizations should implement comprehensive risk assessment strategies incorporating gender-specific factors and psychological profiles to identify vulnerable staff earlier. Enhancing reporting systems, offering proactive psychological support, and promoting adaptive coping strategies are essential to reduce harm, foster resilience, thereby creating safer and healthier work environments.
Keywords: Workplace Harassment (WPH), Healthcare Workers (HW), Psychodiagnostics Questionnaires, Workplace Health Promotion (WHP), Occupational Health
Received: 05 Jun 2025; Accepted: 21 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Vivarelli, Oliveri, Savasta, Fiorino and Fenga. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Silvia Vivarelli, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences, Morphological and Functional Imaging, Section of Occupational Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.