ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Mental Health
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1642053
This article is part of the Research TopicMental Health and Well-being of Sex Workers: Exploring Risks, Resilience and InterventionsView all 4 articles
Vulnerable Exposures and Outcomes of Children of Female Sex Workers in Low-and Middle-income Countries: Application of bioecological vulnerability framework
Provisionally accepted- 1Dalhousie University Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Halifax, Canada
- 2Global Health Promise, Portland, United States
- 3Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Children of female sex workers (CFSW) are exposed to unique bioecological vulnerabilities, negatively affecting their developmental outcomes. We interviewed 1,280 female sex worker mothers (FSWM) in eight low-and middle-income countries (Angola, Brazil, South Africa, Democratic Republic of Congo, India, Indonesia, Kenya, and Nigeria) between January 16 and October 1, 2019. This exploratory study focused on multilayered exposures from early childhood to adolescence resulting in maldevelopment and other negative outcomes for CFSW, as reported by mothers. We used Bronfenbrenner's revised Bioecological System Theory of Human Development as our analytical framework. The interview data contained both numerical responses and short answers. Quantitative information was summarized using prevalence estimates, and textual information was coded and grouped into major categories using inductive coding. FSWM reported outcomes varied across countries but supported complex interaction within and between the micro-, meso-, exo-and macro systems, described by the theoretical framework. Findings included CFSW exposure to suboptimal childcaring and rearing environments and a high prevalence of adverse outcomes including the majority of (61%, country range 45-67%) daughters entering sex work at an early age (14 years, country range 13.5-18 years), both sons and daughters experiencing physical harm (72%, range 21-85%) and sexual abuse (sons 57%, daughters 74%). Daughters were introduced to sex work as a mode of survival, out of necessity. The FSWM reported outcomes include bioecological vulnerabilities that impeded their sons' development, and protective environments that supported sons' healthy development. These were categorized as: 1) vulnerabilities associated with high risk living environments such as brothels, hot spots and on the street where they were exposed to sex work; 2) negative psychological, physical, and behavioral outcomes including becoming criminals, victims and perpetrators of abuse and 3) protective environments of living away from the mothers work and finding informal work that may mitigate the harmful effects of bioecological vulnerable exposures. The CFSW experienced significant threats to healthy development, contributing to adverse physical and psychological developmental outcomes. These findings underscore the urgent need for evidence-based policy directives, interventions, and support.
Keywords: Children of female sex workers, Vulnerability Assessment, Child and adolescent health, developmental exposures and outcomes, Bioecological Model of Development
Received: 11 Jun 2025; Accepted: 26 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Weerasinghe, Fitzgerald, Perttu, Wills and Macias-Konstantopoulos. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Swarna D.S. Weerasinghe, Dalhousie University Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Halifax, Canada
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.