ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Occupational Health and Safety
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1642906
This article is part of the Research TopicNurse Fatigue: Investigating Burnout, Health Risks, and Prevention StrategiesView all 8 articles
The Mediating Role of Coping Styles in the Relationship Between Personality Traits and Occupational Well-Being Among Nursing Staff
Provisionally accepted- 1Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China
- 2Second People's Hospital of Lanzhou City, Lanzhou, China
- 3Lanzhou Pulmonary Hospital, Lanzhou, China
- 4Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: This study aimed to quantify the mediating effects of positive and negative coping styles on the relationship between the Big Five personality traits and occupational well-being among nurses. The findings aim to provide a scientific basis for optimizing psychological health interventions for nurses. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted, involving 9,578 nursing staff from over 50 hospitals of varying tiers in Lanzhou, China. Standardized scales—the Chinese Big Five Personality Inventory-Brief (CBF-PI-B), Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ), and Occupational Well-being Scale for Healthcare Workers—were administered. Mediation effects were tested using the Bootstrap method, with adjustments for covariates including gender, age, and department. Results: Personality traits showed significant correlations with occupational well-being: Extraversion, conscientiousness, agreeableness, and openness were positively correlated with well-being (r =0.337 to 0.400), while neuroticism was negatively correlated (r = –0.338). Coping styles played a pivotal mediating role: Neuroticism indirectly reduced well-being through negative coping strategies (e.g., problem avoidance), while conscientiousness, agreeableness, openness, and extraversion correlated with positive coping strategies (e.g., active problem-solving) and higher well-being. The mediating effect of positive coping was substantially larger, accounting for 23.69% to 31.93% of the total effects, whereas negative coping accounted for less than 5.69%. Conclusion: Personality traits indirectly affect occupational well-being via positive or negative coping strategies, with proactive coping serving as the critical pathway for well-being enhancement. This study reveals an asymmetry in the mediating mechanism, where the efficacy of positive coping far outweighs that of negative coping. These insights offer novel perspectives for developing targeted interventions, such as personality assessment-guided coping skills training. These findings support a 'Coping Efficacy Asymmetry Model' providing a new framework for interventions that prioritize building positive coping skills to enhance nurse well-being and support healthcare system resilience.
Keywords: Nursing Staff, personality traits, Coping styles, Occupational well-being, Mediating role
Received: 07 Jun 2025; Accepted: 19 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Li, Liu, Jia and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Sheng Li, Second People's Hospital of Lanzhou City, Lanzhou, China
Jinyu Wang, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
