Exploring motivations and barriers in prostate cancer screening: lessons from a volunteer-based MRI screening study

Miroslav Svetlak^1,2Michal Standara^2*Tatiana Malatincová¹Michal Staník²David Miklánek²Kateřina Hejcmanová¹Miloš Pacal²Roman Hrabec²Ondřej Ngo¹Karel Hejduk¹Jan Křístek²Michal Uher²Ondřej Májek¹Alexandr Poprach²

• ¹Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
• ²Masarykuv onkologicky ustav, Brno, Czechia

Background Prostate cancer remains a significant public health challenge, an early detection with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and biparametric MRI (bpMRI) can improve outcomes. However, participation hinges on motivational, psychological, and logistical factors. This study examines the motivational profile of men in the ProstaPilot study to guide strategies to increase uptake of state-of-the-art prostate cancer screening programs. Methods The ProstaPilot study enrolled 423 men who underwent both PSA testing and bpMRI of the prostate. Positive results (PSA ≥ 3 µg/L or PI-RADS 4-5 lesions) were referred for further urological examination and biopsy. Using an exploratory correlational design, 360 participants completed a detailed questionnaire. Motivational factors were extracted via Principal Component Analysis with Oblimin rotation (PCA). Perceptions of prostate cancer risk, severity, and prevention were rated on 1–10 scales (10 = most positive). Results PCA identified four motivational factors explaining 55.6% of variance: (1) concerns about screening (e.g., unnecessary surgery, loss of control); (2) perceived benefits of early detection; (3) social motivation (e.g., contributing to research, role modeling); and (4) barriers (e.g., logistics, embarrassment). Over half (51.1%) had not considered screening before ProstaPilot; others decided over varying timeframes. Participants showed high awareness of prostate cancer and valued early detection, rating screening effectiveness 9.55 ± 0.98 and trust in healthcare professionals 9.6 ± 1.0. Social/familial influences were moderate. Satisfaction was high: likelihood to recommend 9.45 ± 1.22; confidence in continuing participation 9.9 ± 0.39. Conclusion Highly motivated participants were marked by strong knowledge of prostate cancer screening, trust in healthcare providers, supportive social context, and high personal commitment. These findings support personalized, socially supportive, educational strategies to increase uptake of state-of-the-art screening.