ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Health Economics
This article is part of the Research TopicIntegrating Economics into Population Health: Assessing Policies and OutcomesView all 18 articles
Analysis and Optimization of Inpatient Cost Structure for Fracture Patients Under the Implementation of the DRG Policy
Provisionally accepted- 1Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China
- 2Haicheng Orthopedic Hospital, Haicheng, China
- 3Monitoring and Statistical Research Center of the National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, BeiIJing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Fractures are among the most common traumatic injuries in China, with rising incidence due to aging, traffic accidents, and sports injuries, imposing a heavy economic burden. To enhance cost efficiency, China launched a nationwide Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRG) payment reform in 2019. While DRG effectively controls costs in chronic diseases, its impact on trauma such as fractures remains unclear due to complex and variable treatments. Most prior studies focus on epidemiology, lacking economic evaluation under DRG. This study assesses how DRG reform affects inpatient cost structures of fracture patients and differences across comorbidities and fracture types.Methods: Data from 12,101 fracture inpatients (ICD-10 S22–S92) at a tertiary hospital in Liaoning (2018–2024) were analyzed. Structural change analysis evaluated shifts in cost composition before and after DRG reform. Interrupted time series (ITS) modeling estimated immediate and trend effects of the policy introduced on July 1, 2019. Grey relational analysis quantified the contribution of each cost category to total expenses.Results: After DRG implementation, median drug cost fell by 18.1% (3,416.06→2,796.74 CNY), while consumables slightly increased (7,358.12→7,465.64 CNY; p<0.05). Therapeutic and surgical costs rose moderately, indicating a shift toward technical services. Rehabilitation costs decreased for some fractures (S72) but increased for others (S82), reflecting heterogeneity. Structural variation was highest in consumables for spinal fractures (S32, DsV=2170.42%) and drug costs for femoral fractures declined (S72, DsV=-39.78%). Patients with comorbidities showed greater cost adjustments (15.3% higher DsV; p<0.01). ITS showed significant post-policy changes (p<0.05): S32 total costs reversed from rising (β₁=1247.93) to falling (β₃=-2467.0). Diagnostic costs rose for most fractures but fell in S32 (β₃=-227.16); S72 increased (β₃=52.86). Medication and treatment costs declined overall, most strongly in S32 (β₃=-355.1). Consumables rose in S42 (β₃=1578.62), and rehabilitation decreased across all types, most in S32 (β₃=-483.58). Grey relational analysis showed fracture-specific structural shifts: diagnostic and drug costs became more concentrated in S22 and S42, while S52 and S62 declined across categories.Conclusion: DRG reform reduced drug expenses but increased diagnostic and consumables costs, indicating structural shifts and fracture-type heterogeneity. These results highlight the need for refined, type-specific management strategies and provide evidence for optimizing DRG payment standards in China.
Keywords: Drg1, fracture2, Inpatient Cost3, Analysis andOptimization4, Interrupted time series5, Grey relational analysis6, Health policyoptimization7
Received: 17 Jun 2025; Accepted: 29 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Su, Su, Li, Jin, Wang, Liu and Wen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Hongjuan Wen, 1007481182@qq.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
