ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Health Economics
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1649879
This article is part of the Research TopicPublic Health Outcomes: The Role of Social Security Systems in Improving Residents' Health Welfare, Volume IIView all 5 articles
How Do Low-Carbon City Policies Shape Elderly Health? Evidence from Environmental and Mobility Pathways in China
Provisionally accepted- 1Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, China
- 2Kyoto Daigaku, Kyoto, Japan
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objectives: As environmental pollution and population aging become increasingly severe, it is especially important to assess the health co-benefits of climate-related urban policies. This study aims to examine the impact of China's Low-Carbon City Pilot Program (LCCP) on the health of the elderly. It focuses on potential mechanisms such as improvements in environmental quality and increases in nonmotorized transportation.Methods:This study uses a multi-period Difference-in-Differences (DID) approach to evaluate the health effects of the LCCP. The analysis draws on nationally representative panel data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) between 2012 and 2018. The sample is restricted to individuals aged 60 and above. The main outcome variable is self-rated health, with frequency of medical visits used as a supplementary indicator. The treatment variable is defined based on the official list of low-carbon pilot cities and their launch years. The analysis controls for various individual, intergenerational, and household-level characteristics. To explore possible mechanisms, the study conducts mediation analysis focusing on perceived environmental quality and non-motorized travel behavior. It also includes commuting distance and commuting time as moderating variables to assess the limiting effect of spatial accessibility.The results show that the LCCP significantly improved the health of older adults. The DID estimates indicate a positive policy effect that remains robust across alternative model specifications and when using other outcome variables such as medical visit frequency. The mediation analysis suggests that improvements in environmental quality-especially in subjective environmental perceptions-and increases in non-motorized travel are key channels for health improvement. In addition, the health benefits of the policy are more pronounced among elderly individuals who face longer commuting distances and times. Subgroup analysis further reveals heterogeneous effects: the policy yields greater health improvements for males, rural residents, and the younger elderly (aged 60-69). Overall, these findings support the proposed hypotheses and highlight both the direct and indirect health benefits of China's low-carbon urban transition.This study concludes that the LCCP significantly enhanced elderly health by improving environmental quality and travel behavior. The health effects are stronger for groups with better spatial accessibility and are partially realized through household perceptions and increased non-motorized travel.
Keywords: low carbon city pilot policy, Elderly health, Environmental quaitty, non-motorized travel, Spatial accessibility
Received: 19 Jun 2025; Accepted: 30 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Yue and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Xiaonan Yue, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.