The reference for [15] was erroneously written as “Zhu Z, Wang HL, Zhang Y. Analysis of serum IgM antibody and viral nucleic acid detection results in measles and rubella cases in China from 2014 to 2023. Chinese J Prev Med. (2024) 8:1318–23. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20240306-00191”. It should be “Zhu Z, Wang HL, Zhang Y. Analysis of serum IgM antibody and viral nucleic acid detection results in measles and rubella cases in China from 2014 to 2023. Chin J Prev Med. (2024) 8:1318–23. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20240306-00191”.
There was a mistake in Figures 1, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 as published. To ensure academic rigor, we have rechecked the data and performed additional analyses using the latest procedures, providing more accurate data and higher-resolution figures. The corrected Figures 1, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 appear below.
Figure 1
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
There was a mistake in Tables 1 and 2 as published. To ensure academic rigor, we have rechecked the data and performed additional analyses using the latest procedures, providing more accurate data. The corrected Tables 1 and 2 appear below.
Table 1
| Regions | Trends | AAPC (%) | AAPC 95%CI(%) | Z | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LowerCI | UpperCI | |||||
| Beijing | Stable | −10.20 | −20.69 | 1.67 | −1.70 | 0.090 |
| Tianjin | Decrease | −19.39 | −32.02 | −4.41 | −2.48 | 0.013 |
| Hebei | Stable | 5.19 | −31.55 | 61.64 | 0.23 | 0.817 |
| Shanxi | Stable | −5.87 | −22.58 | 14.46 | −0.61 | 0.544 |
| Inner Mongolia | Stable | −5.77 | −29.58 | 26.08 | −0.40 | 0.689 |
| Liaoning | Stable | 1.62 | −29.88 | 47.27 | 0.08 | 0.932 |
| Jilin | Decrease | −21.81 | −33.00 | −8.75 | −3.12 | 0.002 |
| Heilongjiang | Stable | 12.88 | −40.31 | 113.47 | 0.37 | 0.709 |
| Shanghai | Stable | 1.11 | −16.21 | 21.99 | 0.11 | 0.909 |
| Jiangsu | Stable | 2.08 | −13.19 | 20.05 | 0.25 | 0.803 |
| Zhejiang | Decrease | −18.86 | −28.35 | −8.11 | −3.29 | 0.001 |
| Anhui | Stable | −2.16 | −14.38 | 11.80 | −0.32 | 0.748 |
| Fujian | Stable | −6.97 | −14.21 | 0.89 | −1.89 | 0.077 |
| Jiangxi | Stable | −4.06 | −15.50 | 8.93 | −0.64 | 0.523 |
| Shandong | Stable | −4.16 | −26.59 | 25.10 | −0.31 | 0.754 |
| Henan | Stable | −9.14 | −23.00 | 7.22 | −1.13 | 0.256 |
| Hubei | Stable | 14.87 | −10.22 | 46.98 | 1.10 | 0.270 |
| Hunan | Stable | −14.6 | −67.82 | 126.67 | −0.32 | 0.751 |
| Guangdong | Stable | −13.12 | −39.45 | 24.66 | −0.76 | 0.445 |
| Guangxi | Stable | 2.13 | −35.36 | 61.36 | 0.09 | 0.928 |
| Hainan | Stable | 15.36 | −26.64 | 81.39 | 0.62 | 0.536 |
| Chungking | Stable | −0.61 | −9.67 | 9.36 | −0.14 | 0.893 |
| Sichuan | Stable | −6.88 | −14.25 | 1.12 | −1.83 | 0.085 |
| Guizhou | Stable | −7.78 | −16.20 | 1.49 | −1.79 | 0.092 |
| Yunnan | Stable | −4.53 | −19.62 | 13.40 | −0.53 | 0.598 |
| Tibet | Stable | −10.75 | −45.03 | 44.89 | −0.46 | 0.645 |
| Shaanxi | Stable | −6.16 | −16.87 | 5.94 | −1.03 | 0.304 |
| Gansu | Stable | −22.79 | −76.32 | 151.76 | −0.43 | 0.668 |
| Qinghai | Stable | 4.47 | −24.96 | 45.46 | 0.26 | 0.796 |
| Ningxia | Decrease | −18.75 | −29.62 | −6.21 | −2.84 | 0.005 |
| Sinkiang | Decrease | −19.69 | −28.03 | −10.38 | −3.92 | < 0.001 |
| Mainland China | Stable | −6.36 | −17.09 | 5.77 | −1.06 | 0.291 |
The long-term trends of rubella incidence in the whole country and 31 regions from 2004 to 2021.
Table 2
| Age groups | Trends | AAPC (%) | AAPC 95%CI(%) | Z | P-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LowerCI | UpperCI | |||||
| 0– | Decrease | −14.35 | −22.67 | −5.12 | −2.97 | 0.003 |
| 1– | Decrease | −18.46 | −25.86 | −10.32 | −4.2 | < 0.001 |
| 2– | Decrease | −20.98 | −27.73 | −13.59 | −5.17 | < 0.001 |
| 3– | Decrease | −22.78 | −29.64 | −15.24 | −5.44 | < 0.001 |
| 4– | Decrease | −25.2 | −32.77 | −16.78 | −5.33 | < 0.001 |
| 5– | Decrease | −28.32 | −37.95 | −17.19 | −4.52 | < 0.001 |
| 6– | Decrease | −29.96 | −39.8 | −18.5 | −4.61 | < 0.001 |
| 7– | Decrease | −18.67 | −28.82 | −7.07 | −3.04 | 0.002 |
| 8– | Decrease | −22.25 | −30.02 | −13.62 | −4.68 | < 0.001 |
| 9– | Decrease | −16.96 | −24.25 | −8.97 | −3.96 | < 0.001 |
| 10– | Stable | 10.12 | −35.01 | 86.59 | 0.36 | 0.72 |
| 15– | Stable | −16.5 | −62.94 | 88.15 | −0.44 | 0.664 |
| 20– | Stable | 22.55 | −23.83 | 97.16 | 0.84 | 0.402 |
| 25– | Stable | 5.76 | −16.08 | 33.29 | 0.47 | 0.635 |
| 30– | Stable | 4.34 | −10.12 | 21.13 | 0.56 | 0.577 |
| 35– | Stable | 5.05 | −9.89 | 22.48 | 0.63 | 0.529 |
| 40– | Stable | −0.07 | −6.67 | 7 | −0.02 | 0.982 |
| 45– | Stable | −1.04 | −14.3 | 14.27 | −0.14 | 0.887 |
| 50– | Decrease | −8.27 | −14.59 | −1.47 | −2.37 | 0.018 |
| 55– | Stable | −6.7 | −16.6 | 4.39 | −1.21 | 0.226 |
| 60– | Stable | −7.8 | −15.77 | 0.93 | −1.76 | 0.078 |
| 65– | Stable | −6.4 | −22.04 | 12.38 | −0.71 | 0.478 |
| 70– | Decrease | −12.39 | −19.5 | −4.64 | −3.06 | 0.002 |
| 75– | Decrease | −13.13 | −19.56 | −6.19 | −3.59 | < 0.001 |
| 80– | Stable | −9.24 | −19.34 | 2.13 | −1.61 | 0.107 |
| 85– | Stable | −7.12 | −30.27 | 23.73 | −0.5 | 0.614 |
The long-term trends of rubella incidence in 26 age groups from 2004 to 2021.
A correction has been made to Section 2.2 Research methods, 2.2.1 Basic statistical description, paragraph 1. The text “(incidence = number of cases/number of exposed population *100,000%)” has been changed to “(incidence = number of cases/number of exposed population *100,000).”
The original version of this article has been updated.
Statements
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
rubella, incidence, descriptive study, joinpoint regression model, China
Citation
Su Y, Su Z, Huang Z, Yang S, Li Z and Li H (2025) Correction: Long-term trends in rubella incidence across various regions and age groups in China, 2004–2021. Front. Public Health 13:1650142. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1650142
Received
19 June 2025
Accepted
23 June 2025
Published
09 July 2025
Volume
13 - 2025
Edited and reviewed by
Marc Jean Struelens, Université libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Su, Su, Huang, Yang, Li and Li.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Shan Yang 1402650@qq.comZhongyou Li 582893156@qq.comHai Li lihai6609@hotmail.com
†These authors share first authorship
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.