Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Occupational Health and Safety

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1651921

This article is part of the Research TopicNavigating Environmental Hazards in the Workplace: Impacts and InterventionsView all 24 articles

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Prevalence and Demographic Risk 1 Factors of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders in Construction Workers

Provisionally accepted
Weiner  SantosWeiner Santos1Alejandro  LorenteAlejandro Lorente2Carmen  RojasCarmen Rojas3Rui  IsidoroRui Isidoro1Ana  DiasAna Dias4Gonzalo  MariscalGonzalo Mariscal5*Ahmed  Hamady ZabadyAhmed Hamady Zabady6*Rafael  LorenteRafael Lorente7
  • 1Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
  • 2Unidade Local de Saude do Litoral Alentejano EPE, Santiago do Cacém, Portugal
  • 3Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
  • 4Polytechnic University of Beja., Beja, Portugal
  • 5Universitat de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
  • 6Damanhour University, Damanhour, Egypt
  • 7Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Construction workers, who are constantly engaged in physically demanding tasks, face a significant prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). These conditions affect their quality of life and work performance and call for immediate attention. This study delves into the prevalence of WMSDs among construction workers and the associated demographic risk factors, highlighting the issue's urgency. Methods: Our research process was thorough. Our search spanned electronic databases like PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science. We included studies that involved adult construction workers reporting the prevalence of WMSDs such as back pain, neck pain, and other musculoskeletal diseases. The data were rigorously analyzed using R software, with subgroup and meta-regression analyses to assess the association between demographic factors and the prevalence of WMSDs. Results: The prevalence pooled by the meta-analysis was 59% for WMSDs from 14 studies with extensive study-level heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis illustrated differences by region, with higher prevalence in Asia (63%) compared to America (39%) and Africa (52%). Analysis of demographic factors identified the prevalence as significantly higher in the male gender (OR = 19.60). Workers over 40 were likelier to have WMSDs (OR = 39.04). Daily work hours were inconsistently associated. Lower back and shoulders were the most affected body regions. Conclusion: Our findings underscore the need for further research to identify other risk factors and design effective prevention strategies. The high incidence of WMSDs among construction workers, significantly related to demographic factors such as gender and age, calls for continuous investigation and the introduction of targeted interventions like work rotation, ergonomic training, and psychosocial support. These measures are crucial in preventing WMSDs and promoting the well-being and performance of construction workers.

Keywords: work-related musculoskeletal disorders, Prevalence, Construction workers, demographic risk factors, Meta-analysis

Received: 11 Jul 2025; Accepted: 24 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Santos, Lorente, Rojas, Isidoro, Dias, Mariscal, Zabady and Lorente. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Gonzalo Mariscal, gonzalo.mariscal@mail.ucv.es
Ahmed Hamady Zabady, a.zabady00711@sci.dmu.edu.eg

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.