Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1655189

Meaningful Public Involvement: Changing research institutions towards epistemic justice

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
  • 2Queens University, School of Nursing, Kingston, Canada

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Public and patient involvement and engagement (PPIE) in research is increasingly expected and often formally required by the sponsors. However, creating and sustaining conditions for meaningful PPIE can be challenging. It requires efforts of all involved parties. While much attention is given for the ethical inclusion of individuals as research participants, their collaboration with researchers and design of accessible research processes, there is a question of how research institutions can support PPIE. We argue for comprehensive changes within research institutions to facilitate meaningful PPIE practice. These changes should include institutional culture and attitudes towards the public members involved in research, to foster meaningful encounters between people with different forms of knowledge and life experience, such as professionally-trained researchers and members of marginalized social groups. In this paper, we propose a framework of institutional changes for PPIE, which focuses on their sociocultural and epistemic features. We explore the context of PPIE and possible risks related to disregarding public members as owners of valid knowledge. We use the order of change model as a frame and emphasize the role of third-order changes, which involve raising awareness about diverse forms of knowledge. Such changes would allow for sustaining PPIE research as knowledge space, wherein public members and researchers can respectfully share knowledge to inform scientific inquiries. Based on these conceptualizations, we outline practical examples and future directions. Better conceptualizing of institutional changes can contribute to facilitating their implementation and thereby more ethical research practice.

Keywords: public and patient engagement, Public and patient involvement, institutionalchange, Epistemic Justice, knowledge space, Research institution, research ethics

Received: 27 Jun 2025; Accepted: 03 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Krawczyk, Piasecki, Galica and Waligora. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Marcin Waligora, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.