Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Radiation and Health

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1659601

Categorization of screen glasses of mobile devices with respect to their EPR spectral properties and potential applicability for use in retrospective dosimetry

Provisionally accepted
Agnieszka  MarciniakAgnieszka Marciniak1*Małgorzata  JuniewiczMałgorzata Juniewicz1Bartłomiej  CiesielskiBartłomiej Ciesielski1Piotr  BoguśPiotr Boguś1Kamila  Mazur-OleszczukKamila Mazur-Oleszczuk1Anita  Prawdzik-DampcAnita Prawdzik-Dampc2Jakub  KarczewskiJakub Karczewski3
  • 1Gdanski Uniwersytet Medyczny Wydzial Lekarski, Gdańsk, Poland
  • 2Gdanski Uniwersytet Medyczny Katedra i Klinika Onkologii i Radioterapii, Gdańsk, Poland
  • 3Institute of Nanotechnology and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Applied Physics and Mathematics, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk, Poland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Industrial and medical applications of ionizing radiation, as well as unstable political situation worldwide, which may result in military releases of radioactivity, increase a risk of uncontrolled exposures of people to ionizing radiation. Retrospective dosimetry allowing for fast triage of victims is crucial for rescue actions. Previous studies showed that smartphones’ screens are promising for dosimetry based on electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR). A variety of EPR line-shapes in different screens, regarding background signals (BG) and radiation-induced signals (RIS), various sensitivities to interfering factors like UV light and temperature, impose serious limitations on this method. This study focuses on classification of screen glasses, taking into account their elemental compositions, EPR properties (sensitivity to UV and temperature), in order to formulate practical recommendations for dosimetry. EPR spectra of 45 screens, unirradiated and irradiated with X-rays, were measured. Elemental composition of the glasses was determined using Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy. Effects of UV on samples’ EPR spectra were checked. Annealing at 200 °C enabled to evaluate effects of heating on BG and RIS. A self-written program based on c-means algorithm was used to find intercorrelations between elemental compositions and EPR features (types) of the glasses. Our spectra-differentiating algorithm resulted in identification of five types of glasses correlated with their elemental composition, sensitivity to X-rays, to UV and high temperature. Glasses labelled as type III and V were recommended for dosimetry due to their resistance to UV and undergoing temperature-caused bleaching of RIS without affecting their BG signals; a feature which enables reconstruction of the original BG from an irradiated sample – a key step in retrospective dosimetry. The introduced categorization of screen glasses, based on chosen features of their EPR spectra, is a simple and practical method for evaluation of their applicability in retrospective dosimetry following radiation accidents, e.g. for triage of exposed people.

Keywords: EPR, Glass, Retrospective dosimetry, Radiation accident, mobile devices 2. Materials and methods

Received: 04 Jul 2025; Accepted: 11 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Marciniak, Juniewicz, Ciesielski, Boguś, Mazur-Oleszczuk, Prawdzik-Dampc and Karczewski. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Agnieszka Marciniak, Gdanski Uniwersytet Medyczny Wydzial Lekarski, Gdańsk, Poland

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.