Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Public Mental Health

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1659671

This article is part of the Research TopicInnovative Strategies for Urban Public Health Resilience in Crisis SituationsView all 31 articles

COVID-19 ON DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY A Systematic Review of Impacts of COVID-19 on Depression and Anxiety among General Populations around the World

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Xi'an Technological University, Xi'an, China
  • 2Social and Public Administration School, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
  • 3Wuhan University School of Journalism and Communication, Wuhan, China
  • 4Shanghai Open University, Shanghai, China
  • 5Shanghai Business School, Shanghai, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly impacted global mental health, with significant disparities in depression and anxiety observed across populations and countries. Existing literature highlights the role of social determinants of health (SDH) in shaping mental health outcomes, yet systematic reviews synthesizing these impacts across diverse socioeconomic and policy contexts remain limited. This study provides an overview of how COVID-19 is affecting depression and anxiety among general populations, alongside inequalities driven by the SDH. Methods: Six databases (CNKI, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science) were searched from March 2020 to February 2024. Inclusion criteria encompassed cross-sectional/longitudinal studies assessing depression/anxiety in adults (≥18 years) using validated scales (e.g., PHQ-9, GAD-7). After screening 4,916 records, 59 studies met eligibility criteria. Quality assessment utilized the Joanna Briggs Institute tool, and data extraction covered study characteristics, outcomes, and SDH factors. This review is registered with PROSPERO: CRD420251023201. Results: Among 59 studies (39 from low-and middle-income countries [LMICs]; 16 from high-income countries [HICs]), younger individuals, women, and socioeconomically disad-vantaged groups exhibited heightened vulnerability to depression and anxiety. High-income countries with stringent lockdowns (e.g., the U.S., France) reported sustained psychological distress, while nations adopting effective early containment strategies saw mental health im-provements over time. Population-level determinants, including healthcare infrastructure and policy stringency, significantly influenced outcomes. Low-resource settings faced worsened mental health burdens due to prolonged restrictions and limited medical access. Individual and community-level factors such as unemployment, housing instability, and low social support amplified risks. Temporal trends revealed worsening mental health during extended lockdowns and disparities in recovery trajectories across regions. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated mental health inequalities, disproportionately affecting specific groups and underscoring the interplay of SDH. Tailored interven-tions addressing socioeconomic vulnerabilities, enhancing social support, and balancing infection control with psychological well-being are critical.

Keywords: Mental Health, Anxiety, Depression, Systematic review, COVID-19

Received: 04 Jul 2025; Accepted: 03 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Hou, Duan, Wang, Liao, Bu, Mu, Tang and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Xiaoqing Tang, xqtang@out-look.com
Dong Liu, liudongld@outlook.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.