Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Environmental Health and Exposome

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1660982

This article is part of the Research TopicAssessing Environmental Influences on Maternal and Infant Health Amidst Climate ChangeView all 6 articles

Association between Season and Pregnancy Outcomes in Fresh Embryo Transfer Cycles: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
Qiang  DengQiang Deng1*Feng-Ying  WuFeng-Ying Wu1Jun  WangJun Wang1Jiamei  HuangJiamei Huang2Lu  YinLu Yin1Zhao-Yang  YeZhao-Yang Ye2Ling  LiLing Li2Si-Qi  DengSi-Qi Deng1Zhi-Chun  JinZhi-Chun Jin1,2*
  • 1Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China
  • 2Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province, Wuhan, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Infertility represents a major global public health challenge. Identifying modifiable factors to optimize the outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART) is therefore crucial. Seasonal exposure has been reported to be correlated with natural conception rates, birth patterns, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, the potential associations between seasonal exposure and pregnancy outcomes among women undergoing fresh embryo transfer cycles remain controversial. This study aims to determine whether an association exists between seasonal exposure and pregnancy outcomes following fresh embryo transfer cycles, thereby providing evidence-based guidance on whether seasonal considerations should be integrated into ART treatment planning. Methods: This review adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches were conducted across seven major electronic databases. Data synthesis employed either fixed-effects models. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the Köppen climate classification. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Associations are reported as odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and heterogeneity was quantified using the I² statistic. Results: A total of 19 retrospective studies encompassing 159,696 fresh embryo transfer cycles were included. Overall, no significant associations were found between season and clinical pregnancy or live birth. Subgroup analyses, however, revealed climate-specific variations: In Cwa (humid subtropical) climates, live birth rates were significantly higher in summer than in winter (OR = 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01–1.10; I² = 0%, P heterogeneity < 0.05). In Dfb (warm–summer humid continental) climates, live birth rates were significantly higher in spring than in summer (OR = 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01–1.14). Conclusions: Seasonal variation exhibits no significant association with pregnancy outcomes following fresh embryo transfer cycles. The observed variations within specific climate subgroups may result from multifactorial influences and require further research for validation. Clinicians and patients can prioritize medical indications and personal readiness without concern that seasonal timing may adversely impact pregnancy outcomes.

Keywords: Seasons, fresh embryo transfer cycles, Fertilization in Vitro, Embryo Transfer, Meta-analysis

Received: 07 Jul 2025; Accepted: 27 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Deng, Wu, Wang, Huang, Yin, Ye, Li, Deng and Jin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Qiang Deng, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China
Zhi-Chun Jin, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.