ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1661069
Strengthening Vaccine Uptake: A Qualitative Assessment of Community Health Worker Educational Resource Needs and Community Perspectives on Vaccination in Western Kenya
Provisionally accepted- 1Stanford Centre for Health Education, Cape Town, South Africa
- 2Lwala Community Alliance, Rongo, Kenya
- 3County Government of Migori, Health Department, Migori County, Kenya
- 4Dimagi Inc, Cambridge, United States
- 5Stanford Centre for Health Education, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
- 6Stanford Centre for Health Education, Stanford, United States
- 7Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Vaccination strengthens health systems by preventing the spread of infectious diseases and reducing morbidity and mortality. The introduction of the malaria vaccine in Kenya, alongside the growing access to technological tools, offers a timely opportunity to explore the educational needs of community health workers (CHWs) and the feasibility of digital training and health education resources for CHWs. Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted among CHWs and community members in 2 sub-counties in Migori County. In-depth interviews were held with 20 CHWs selected through stratified random sampling from 72 community health units grouped into eight strata. Additionally, four focus group discussions were conducted with 32 community members. Thematic analysis was conducted using both inductive and deductive coding approaches. Results: CHWs strongly preferred in-person training with visual aids but showed cautious interest in digital learning tools. Key barriers to digital training include limited digital literacy, language constraints, smartphone access, and associated costs. Community members supported vaccination and trusted CHWs due to their training and affiliation with health facilities. However, vaccine hesitancy persists, driven by fears of side effects, cultural beliefs, and misinformation. Confusion surrounding the limited geographic rollout of the malaria vaccine has contributed to skepticism, with some misinformation linking the vaccine to family planning and other health risks. Discussion: A comprehensive, community-centered communication strategy addressing the geographic rollout of the malaria vaccine is necessary. Overcoming the ‘digital divide’ through targeted training, improved technology infrastructure, and user-friendly technology may enhance CHWs’ capacity to deliver effective vaccine education within communities. Keywords: community health workers; digital training; vaccine education; digital divide; malaria vaccine; community perspectives.
Keywords: Community Health Workers, Digital training, Vaccine education, digital divide, Malaria vaccine, community perspectives
Received: 07 Jul 2025; Accepted: 20 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Job, M’pfunya, Mudhune, Omondi, Nyawade, Edelquinn, Sadia, Odhiambo, Ho, Skinner, Johnston, Ward and Wamae. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Nophiwe Job, njob@stanford.edu
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.