ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Health Economics
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1662043
Competing societal objectives in epidemic mitigation: A modelling study of COVID-19 in the Philippines
Provisionally accepted- 1Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
- 2Ateneo de Manila University, Quezon City, Philippines
- 3University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- 4Umea Universitet, Umeå, Sweden
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
School closures and suspension of non-essential economic activities are highly effective respiratory-pandemic mitigation strategies because they effectively interrupt disease transmission. However, they come with high societal costs. Most of these costs are borne by workers who lose their income, especially those who are not supported by welfare benefits, and students whose future income depends on their education. In countries where many households live close to the poverty line, closures should be designed to minimise impacts on the most vulnerable. The objective of this study is to learn and compare policy responses that minimise the number of householdspeople that fall below the poverty line, maximise GDP, or maximise societal welfare in a model of the COVID-19 outbreak in the Philippines. Towards this objective, we construct social welfare functions that take into account lives, education, poverty, and GDPquantify societal welfare in terms of lives, education, GDP, and we introduce poverty as a novel fourth dimension. We then use a population microsimulation model together with an economy-structured, an epidemiological model, and GDP and education projections to determine intervention strategies involving the partial closure of schools and economic sectors with the objective of mitigating the epidemic while minimising societal losses. We find the cost of reducing poverty is substantial in terms of the other outcomes, making a case for poverty reduction as an important tool for increasing societal resilience and preparedness for crises such as pandemics. From a modelling perspective, we identify the need for timely data collection in order to create tools to assist in future epidemics.
Keywords: Epidem iology, Infectious Disease, COVID-19, Economics, Poverty, Pandemic preparedness
Received: 09 Jul 2025; Accepted: 24 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Johnson, Castillo, Lubangco, Teng, Tolentino, Morgenstern, Doohan, Haw, Forchini, de Lara-Tuprio, Sescon and Hauck. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Rob Johnson, rj411@ic.ac.uk
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.