Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Public Mental Health

Psychometric Validation of the WHO-5 and WHO-4 Well-Being Index Scales for Assessing Psychological Well-Being and Detecting Depression in Japanese School-Aged Children: A Community-Based Study

Provisionally accepted
Masaki  AdachiMasaki Adachi1*Michio  TakahashiMichio Takahashi2Hiroyuki  MoriHiroyuki Mori3Tomoko  NishimuraTomoko Nishimura4Makoto  OsadaMakoto Osada5Minami  AdachiMinami Adachi5Rei  MondenRei Monden6Manabu  WakutaManabu Wakuta7Kazuhiko  NakamuraKazuhiko Nakamura5
  • 1Meiji Gakuin University, Tokyo, Japan
  • 2Tohoku Daigaku, Sendai, Japan
  • 3Saitama Gakuen Daigaku, Kawaguchi, Japan
  • 4Osaka Daigaku, Suita, Japan
  • 5Hirosaki Daigaku, Hirosaki, Japan
  • 6Hiroshima Daigaku, Higashihiroshima, Japan
  • 7Research Department, Institute of Child Developmental Science Research, Hamamatsu, Japan

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The 5-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5) is widely used to assess psychological well-being, but its psychometric properties in younger populations, particularly in nonWestern settings, remain underexplored. This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of WHO-5 (WHO-5-J) and a culturally adapted four-item version (WHO-4-J), which excludes a culturally sensitive item ("I have felt cheerful and in good spirits") and uses a simplified four-point Likert scale to minimize cognitive burden among Japanese school-aged children. Data were collected from a large community-based sample of 6,983 students aged 10–15 years (Grades 4–9) in Hirosaki City, Japan. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported the factorial validity and internal consistency of both WHO-5-J (α = 0.84–0.88; ω = 0.86–0.91) and WHO-4-J (α = 0.82–0.88), confirming the unidimensional structures. Multi-group confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated full scalar measurement invariance across age and gender groups. Receiver operating characteristic analyses determined the optimal cutoff scores for detecting psychological distress, with area under the curve values ranging from 0.80 to 0.85, indicating good diagnostic accuracy. Overall, WHO-4-J demonstrated comparable psychometric properties to WHO-5-J, supporting its practical utility as a culturally appropriate tool for assessing psychological well-being and screening for depression in Japanese youth. These findings underscore the importance of cultural adaptation and developmentally appropriate scaling for accurately assessing psychological well-being in diverse, non-Western child populations.

Keywords: WHO-5 Well-Being Index1, psychological well-being2, Cross-cultural validation3, Confirmatory Factor Analysis4, Measurement Invariance5, Depression screening6, School-aged children7, Community sample8

Received: 08 Aug 2025; Accepted: 13 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Adachi, Takahashi, Mori, Nishimura, Osada, Adachi, Monden, Wakuta and Nakamura. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Masaki Adachi, adachi@psy.meijigakuin.ac.jp

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.