- 1FMC Medical Center of Thailand, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
- 2Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
- 3Faculty of Pediatrics & Medicine, International University, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
by Bayraktar, M., Deniz, S., Balci, E., Güveli, R., and Bircan, A. (2025). Front. Public Health. 13:1581720. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1581720
Bayraktar et al. (1) provide compelling evidence on the transformative impact of in-service training on child abuse and neglect (CAaN) detection among family physicians. Their intervention achieved statistically significant improvements across knowledge domains, with effect sizes ranging from large to very large (Cohen's d = 1.00–3.51), markedly exceeding those reported in similar training programs for nurses and pediatric residents (2, 3). The study's rigorous pre-post design, use of validated scales, and coverage of nearly all family physicians in Nigde province strengthen its credibility and contextual relevance.
The commentary reflects a narrative literature review approach to contextualize the study. While not systematic, sources were selected based on relevance, recent publication (within the past 10 years), and citation in major databases including PubMed and Scopus. Keyword combinations such as “child abuse,” “family physicians,” “mandatory reporting,” and “training outcomes” were used in searches. Priority was given to peer-reviewed studies cited in systematic reviews, national policies, or WHO/UNICEF guidelines.
Prior research has predominantly focused on nursing students (4, 5) or hospital-based pediatricians (6), despite the central role of family physicians as first-contact providers in preventive child health systems (7). Bayraktar et al.'s study thus addresses a critical gap. Moreover, their findings raise several key reflections.
First, in terms of effectiveness, while Horstman et al. (8) emphasize the psychological burdens physicians face when reporting CAaN without adequate preparation, the present study demonstrates that structured education reduces such hesitancy by enhancing knowledge and clarifying legal responsibilities.
Second, regarding implementation gaps, their study did not evaluate whether improvements in knowledge and attitudes translated into sustained behavioral change, echoing limitations noted in similar interventions (9, 10). Cross-country reviews also reveal insufficient integration of CAaN assessments into electronic medical records to prompt routine screening (11).
To optimize CAaN detection and reporting, future research and policy should expand into the following dimensions:
1. Longitudinal impact assessment: evaluate whether knowledge gains from training lead to higher reporting rates, improved protection outcomes, and reduced re-abuse among children.
2. Interprofessional training: extend modules to include nurses, midwives, dentists, and social workers, fostering collaborative recognition and management (12).
3. Standardized interview protocols: develop culturally contextualized forensic interviewing guides for family physicians, addressing gaps highlighted in scoping reviews (11).
4. Digital decision-support tools: embed CAaN risk assessment algorithms into family health center electronic systems to prompt routine screening.
5. Legal and psychological protection policies: explore strategies to protect physicians from potential legal retaliation or psychosocial distress following mandatory reporting, as underscored in Australian and New Zealand contexts (8).
6. Ethical dimensions and international frameworks: reporting child abuse involves significant ethical tensions—particularly in balancing physician-patient confidentiality with legal duties to protect the child. These efforts should align with global standards, such as WHO's “INSPIRE” strategies and UNICEF's child protection guidelines, which emphasize frontline health worker capacity-building and institutional support mechanisms.
7. Cultural and systemic barriers in Türkiye: despite legislative frameworks, Türkiye faces barriers such as fear of retaliation, insufficient institutional support, and sociocultural stigma that deter consistent CAaN reporting. Addressing these requires legal clarity, physician support systems, and public awareness campaigns.
8. Comparative implementation models: reference successful implementation in other countries (e.g., Scandinavian models that integrate multidisciplinary CAaN teams into primary care) to highlight best practices.
Conclusion
Bayraktar et al.'s intervention marks a critical step toward systematic CAaN prevention within Türkiye's primary care system. To sustain its impact, scaling such models nationally, evaluating their long-term outcomes, and integrating technology-driven and interprofessional frameworks will be essential. These advances may significantly enhance child safety outcomes in diverse contexts.
Author contributions
SK: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. NP: Writing – review & editing. NL: Writing – review & editing. NK: Validation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. Publication fees were supported by the Program Management Unit for Competitiveness (PMUC), Office of National Higher Education Science Research and Innovation Policy Council, 2024.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. The author declares that Generative AI (ChatGPT by OpenAI) was used to assist in checking English language clarity, structural consistency, logical flow, and citation accuracy during the preparation of this commentary. Final interpretations, academic synthesis, and conclusions are solely those of the author.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Bayraktar M, Deniz S, Balci E, Güveli R, Bircan A. Factors affecting the knowledge levels, awareness, attitudes, and behaviors of family physicians about child abuse and neglect in Turkiye and changes in them with the training provided. Front Public Health. (2025) 13:1581720. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1581720
2. Starling SP, Heisler KW, Paulson JF, Youmans E. Child abuse training and knowledge: a national survey of emergency medicine, family medicine, and pediatric residents and program director. Pediatrics. (2009) 123:596–602. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2938
3. Poreddi V, Pashapu DR, Kathyayani B, Gandhi S, El-Arousy W, Math SB. Nursing students' knowledge of child abuse and neglect in India. Br J Nurs. (2016) 25:264–8. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2016.25.5.264
4. Erkut Z, Gozen D, Ates Besirik S. Nursing students' knowledge level on identification and risks of child abuse and neglect: a descriptive study. J Educ Res Nurs. (2021) 18:231–40. doi: 10.5152/jern.2021.05924
5. Kartal M, Bayraktar M. The effects of undergraduate nursing education in diagnosing the symptoms of child abuse and neglect. Sakarya Med J. (2021) 11:162–9.
6. Özer H, Abakli Inci M. Knowledge and experience of pediatricians and pedodontists in identifying and managing child abuse and neglect cases. Medicine. (2024) 103:e37548. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037548
7. Evans P, editor. The European Definition of General Practice/Family Medicine. Wonca Europe (2023). Available online at: https://www.woncaeurope.org/file/41f61fb9-47d5-4721-884e-603f4afa6588/WONCA_European_Definitions_2_v7.pdf (Accessed July 8, 2025).
8. Horstman A, Smith JA, Bassed RB, Bugeja L. The impacts on paediatricians testifying in cases of child maltreatment: a systematic scoping review. Child Abuse Negl. (2025) 163:107357. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2025.107357
9. Calikoglu E, Atila D, Aktürk Z. Family physicians in an eastern Turkish city need training on child abuse and neglect. Niger J Clin Pract. (2021) 24:1766–72. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_678_20
10. Kanat M, Erkan I. Evaluation of healthcare professionals approach to child abuse and neglect. Istanbul Yeni Yuzyil Univ Yeni Yuzyil J Med Sci. (2021) 2:50–5. doi: 10.46629/JMS.2021.41
11. Ko H, Baugerud GA, Köpp U-MS, Johnson MS, Szyszko Hovden EA. Exploring information-gathering techniques in medical and dental interviews for child abuse and neglect: a comprehensive scoping review of existing gaps. Int J Child Maltreat: Res Policy Pract. (2024) 7:425–45. doi: 10.1007/s42448-024-00197-w
Keywords: child abuse, child neglect, family medicine, in-service training, primary care, health systems, medical education
Citation: Kaewpitoon Rattanapitoon S, Padchasuwan NH, La N and Kaewpitoon Rattanapitoon N (2025) Commentary: Factors affecting the knowledge levels, awareness, attitudes, and behaviors of family physicians about child abuse and neglect in Turkiye and changes in them with the training provided. Front. Public Health 13:1662415. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1662415
Received: 09 July 2025; Accepted: 18 August 2025;
Published: 04 September 2025.
Edited by:
Emanuela Turillazzi, University of Pisa, ItalyReviewed by:
Stefano D'Errico, University of Trieste, ItalyCopyright © 2025 Kaewpitoon Rattanapitoon, Padchasuwan, La and Kaewpitoon Rattanapitoon. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Schawanya Kaewpitoon Rattanapitoon, U2NoYXdhbnlhLnJhdHRAZy5zdXQuYWMudGg=