Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Occupational Health and Safety

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1663535

This article is part of the Research TopicNurse Fatigue: Investigating Burnout, Health Risks, and Prevention StrategiesView all 8 articles

Subjective Workload, Professional Environment and Job Satisfaction of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study

Provisionally accepted
Vilma  ZydziunaiteVilma Zydziunaite*Viktorija  MickeviciuteViktorija Mickeviciute
  • Nursing Department, Klaipedos universitetas, Klaipėda, Lithuania

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: There are studies that reveal the relationship between workload and job satisfaction, studies that would examine workload, professional environment, and job satisfaction separately, but there is still lack of the empirical evidence which proves various combinations between all these mentioned variables internationally within the anesthesia and intensive care nursing community. Aim: This study aimed to analyze the relationship between anesthesia and intensive care nurses’ subjective workload, professional environment, and job satisfaction. Methods: 149 anesthesia and intensive care nurses working in the clinical hospitals of one county of Lithuania participated in the study. NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX), The Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index, and The Questionnaire of the Relation Between Job Satisfaction and Workload were used for data collection. IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences Statistics for Windows, version 29.0 was used for data analysis. Results: Anesthesia and intensive care nurses experience above average or high subjective workload and rate their professional environment and job satisfaction as average. Nurses who experience higher subjective workload experience lower job satisfaction. Similarly, nurses who work in a more favorable professional environment experience lower workload and higher job satisfaction. The highest job satisfaction is among anesthesia and intensive care nurses who experience average workload and rate their professional environment positively. With high workload and unfavorable professional environment, anesthesia and intensive care nurses’ job satisfaction decreases. Conclusion: There is a relationship between anesthesia and intensive care nurses’ workload, professional environment and job satisfaction, regardless of geographical boundaries or different locations, the structure of the healthcare system, and these factors constantly affect each other. Subjective workload, work environment, and job satisfaction of anesthesia and intensive care nurses are interrelated and influence each other. Nurses who work in an unfavorable environment without managerial support, collaboration, and teamwork experience higher workload and lower job satisfaction. This means that job satisfaction decreases when there is a high workload and an unfavorable work environment.

Keywords: anesthesia / intensive care nurse, Cross-sectional study, Job Satisfaction, Professional environment, subjective workload

Received: 10 Jul 2025; Accepted: 19 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zydziunaite and Mickeviciute. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Vilma Zydziunaite, Nursing Department, Klaipedos universitetas, Klaipėda, Lithuania

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.