Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Infectious Diseases: Epidemiology and Prevention

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1665341

Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with brucellosis in humans and livestock in Nyagatare district of Rwanda

Provisionally accepted
Jean Bosco  NtivuguruzwaJean Bosco Ntivuguruzwa1Emmanuel  KabalisaEmmanuel Kabalisa2Happy  Jean Bosco AsifiweHappy Jean Bosco Asifiwe3Adeline  Gapasi UwamahoroAdeline Gapasi Uwamahoro4Immaculée  NyampingaImmaculée Nyampinga2Agrippine  MukarurangwaAgrippine Mukarurangwa2Nadine  RujeniNadine Rujeni3Jean  Paul HabimanaJean Paul Habimana1Marie  Louise MukamuhirwaMarie Louise Mukamuhirwa1Patience  KaremeraPatience Karemera1Placidie  UmukunziPlacidie Umukunzi1Beathe  IradukundaBeathe Iradukunda1Patrick  MazimpakaPatrick Mazimpaka1Peter  HudsonPeter Hudson5,6Maurice  ByukusengeMaurice Byukusenge7Joram  Josephat BuzaJoram Josephat Buza8Vivek  KapurVivek Kapur5,8,9Adolphe  A NdikubwimanaAdolphe A Ndikubwimana4Isabelle  MukagatareIsabelle Mukagatare2Martin  NtawubiziMartin Ntawubizi1Robab  KataniRobab Katani10,8*
  • 1School of Veterinary Medicine, College of Agriculture, Animal Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Rwanda, Nyagatare, Rwanda
  • 2National Reference Laboratory, Rwanda Biomedical Center, Kigali, Rwanda
  • 3School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda
  • 4School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Nyagatare, Rwanda
  • 5The Pennsylvania State University Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, University Park, United States
  • 6The Pennsylvania State University Department of Biology, University Park, United States
  • 7The Pennsylvania State University Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University Park, United States
  • 8Nelson Mandela African Institute of Science and Technology Water Infrastructure and Sustainable Energy Futures, Arusha, Tanzania
  • 9The Pennsylvania State University Department of Animal Science, University Park, United States
  • 10The Pennsylvania State University (PSU), University Park, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Brucellosis is a significant but under-reported bacterial zoonosis in Rwanda. Despite recognition as one of Rwanda's top six priority zoonotic diseases in 2019, comprehensive epidemiological data linking human and animal infections remain limited, particularly in high-risk pastoral communities. This study aimed to determine brucellosis seroprevalence and associated risk factors in humans and livestock in Nyagatare District, a major livestock-producing region of Rwanda. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from March to October 2023 across three sectors (Karangazi, Rwempasha, and Rwimiyanga sectors) using stratified random sampling. Blood samples were collected from 886 humans and 930 livestock (637 cattle, 222 goats, 71 sheep) and screened via indirect Enzyme-Linked-Immunosorbent Assay. Risk factor data were collected through structured questionnaires. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with seropositivity, with results expressed as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: The overall seroprevalence was 19.9% (176/886; 95% CI: 17.3-22.6) in humans and 10.9% (101/930; 95% CI: 9.0-13.0) in livestock. Among livestock, seroprevalence was highest in cattle (11.9%, 76/637; 95% CI: 9.4-14.5), followed by goats (11.3%, 25/222; 95% CI: 7.1-15.4), and sheep (1.4%, 1/71; 95% CI: 0.0-4.2). In humans, significant risk factors included male gender (OR=2.66, 95% CI: 1.57-4.64, p<0.001), age >55 years (OR=7.39, 95% CI: 3.82-14.8, p<0.001), and working as an animal health practitioner (OR=2.90, 95% CI:1.38-6.06, p=0.005). In livestock, key risk factors included retention of aborted animals in herds (OR=10.0, 95% CI: 2.27-49.2, p=0.003), improper disposal of aborted fetuses (OR=3.15, 95% CI: 1.18-7.99, p=0.018), and shared water sources (OR=2.49, 95% CI: 1.27-4.93, p=0.008). Geographic analysis revealed higher seropositivity in the Rwimiyaga sector (OR=3.06, 95% CI: 1.37-7.45, p=0.009). Conclusions: This study reveals a high burden of brucellosis in both human and livestock populations in Nyagatare District, with particularly elevated risk among animal health workers and where livestock management practices are poor. Our findings suggest three targeted interventions: (1) Mandatory use of personal protective equipment for animal health workers, (2) Proper disposal of infectious animal materials, and (3) Sector-specific control strategies for high prevalence areas. These results provide critical evidence for developing One-Health interventions to control brucellosis in Rwanda and similar East Africa settings.

Keywords: Brucellosis, Epidemiology, Sero-prevalence, Risk factors, Rwanda, Zoonotic, Nyagatare, One Health

Received: 14 Jul 2025; Accepted: 29 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ntivuguruzwa, Kabalisa, Bosco Asifiwe, Uwamahoro, Nyampinga, Mukarurangwa, Rujeni, Habimana, Mukamuhirwa, Karemera, Umukunzi, Iradukunda, Mazimpaka, Hudson, Byukusenge, Buza, Kapur, Ndikubwimana, Mukagatare, Ntawubizi and Katani. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Robab Katani, The Pennsylvania State University (PSU), University Park, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.