Mentorship in Field Epidemiology Training Programs in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: Mentors' Characteristics, Perceived Challenges, and Training Needs

Yousef Khader^1*Mohannad Al Nsour²Abdulla Bin-Ghouth³Randa Mohammed Nooh⁴Ruba Kamal Alsouri²Ayman Bani Mousa⁵Letaief Hajer⁶Yasir Younis Majeed⁷Haitham Bashier²Khwaja SAEED⁸Hassan CHRIFI⁹Muntasir Elhassan¹⁰Tahmina Shirin¹¹Mumtaz Ali Khan¹²Mohammed Akrim¹³

• ¹Public Health, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
• ²Eastern Mediterranean Public Health Network, Amman, Jordan
• ³Yemen National Public Health Institute, Aden, Yemen
• ⁴Field Epidemiology Training Program, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
• ⁵Jordan Ministry of Health, Amman, Jordan
• ⁶National Observatory of New And Emerging Diseases, Tunis, Tunisia
• ⁷Iraq Ministry of Health, Baghdad, Iraq
• ⁸Afghanistan Ministry of Public Health, Kabul, Afghanistan
• ⁹National School of Public Health, Rabbat, Morocco
• ¹⁰Republic of Sudan Federal Ministry of Health, Khartoum, Sudan
• ¹¹Institute of Epidemiology Disease Control and Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
• ¹²Pakistan Field Epidemiology Training Program, Kabul, Pakistan
• ¹³National school of public health, Rabat, Morocco

Introduction: Despite its significance, mentorship within Field Epidemiology Training Programs (FETP) remains underexplored. This study aimed to assess the demographic and professional profiles of FETP mentors, their mentorship practices, challenges, and training needs within the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR). Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among FETP mentors across nine EMR countries. A structured questionnaire, developed with expert input and pre-tested for clarity, covered demographics, challenges, training needs, satisfaction, and perceived impact. Data were collected via an online survey platform. Results: Of 148 mentors approached, 129 responded (87.2%). Most were male (75.2%) and aged 40–50 years (41.1%). Over half (51.1%) had more than six years of professional experience, while 38.0% had only 0–2 years of mentoring experience. Epidemiology (50.4%) and public health (31.0%) were the most common fields. Most (74.4%) had formal mentorship training, though only 47.3% did so recently. Time management was a common challenge, with 68.0% of mentors reporting difficulty managing time for mentorship activities either often or sometimes. Nearly half (49.2%) found available resources adequate to support their mentorship role. The majority (93.0%) expressed a need for more training, especially in mentoring techniques, communication, and leadership. Workshops were identified by 94.6% of respondents as the preferred method for mentor training. Overall, 59.7% rated their mentorship experience as “Good” and 27.1% as “Excellent.” Conclusion: The study findings underscore the need for structured mentor development, clear guidelines, dedicated time, and enhanced support to strengthen FETP mentorship and public health capacity.