ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Health Economics
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1674658
This article is part of the Research TopicPublic Health Outcomes: The Role of Social Security Systems in Improving Residents' Health Welfare, Volume IIView all 20 articles
The effect of the Arrangements Law on patient mix in Israeli private healthcare
Provisionally accepted- 1Assuta Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
- 2Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel
- 3Netanya Academic College, Netanya, Israel
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Health inequalities remain a persistent challenge, yet little is known about how financing reforms affect access within private hospitals. In 2016 Israel introduced the shorten waiting times reform, designed to expand publicly financed surgeries and reduce reliance on supplementary and private insurance. This study examined its impact on both the financing mix and the socioeconomic composition of surgical patients. Administrative data on 1,082,685 procedures performed at Assuta Medical Centers between 2015 and 2019 were analyzed, comparing pre-reform (2015- October 2017) and post-reform (November 2017-2019) periods, with ambulatory procedures serving as a control group. Publicly financed surgeries increased from 5% to 51% (ATT +51.6pp; 95% CI 43.3-59.9; p<0.001), while supplementary and private financing declined. The share of middle-SES patients rose from 52% to 57% (+7.1pp), high-SES declined from 35% to 29% (-8.0pp), and low-SES increased modestly from 13% to 14% (+0.9pp). In contrast, the control group showed only minimal changes. These findings indicate that the reform was associated with a substantial reallocation of financing and a measurable broadening of SES representation, particularly for middle-income groups, with incremental gains for disadvantaged populations. Overall, the results are consistent with improved equity in access and highlight how regulatory tools can harness private capacity for public benefit within a universal health system.
Keywords: Health financing, Inequality, Private hospitals, Public funding, Socioeconomic status, Health Policy, Israel
Received: 28 Jul 2025; Accepted: 09 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Barnea, Goldshtein and nIV-yAGODA. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Royi Barnea, roybarni1@gmail.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.