Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Aging and Public Health

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1675138

Prevalence and Age-Related Trends of Refractive Errors in Mexican Outpatients: A Cross-Sectional Study

Provisionally accepted
Abraham  García-GilAbraham García-GilBeatriz  Itzel Hernández-JuradoBeatriz Itzel Hernández-JuradoMarco  Antonio Luna-Ruiz-EsparzaMarco Antonio Luna-Ruiz-EsparzaEduardo  Espinoza-AnguloEduardo Espinoza-AnguloHéctor  Machado-JímenezHéctor Machado-JímenezHumberto  Gómez-CampañaHumberto Gómez-CampañaAbraham  Campos-RomeroAbraham Campos-RomeroJonathan  Alcántar FernándezJonathan Alcántar Fernández*
  • Salud Digna, Culiacán, Mexico

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Refractive errors (RE) are the leading cause of visual impairment and blindness worldwide. With ongoing demographic shifts, including population growth, aging, and lifestyle changes, the global prevalence of RE is expected to rise. Robust epidemiological data are essential to mitigate their public health impact. However, in Mexico, comprehensive studies assessing the burden of RE across age groups and regions are scarce. Objective: This study aimed to characterize the epidemiological profile of RE in Mexico using a large outpatient sample, focusing on geographic distribution and variation by sex and age. Methods: We analyzed an electronic database of eye examinations from 3.8 million outpatients who attended Salud Digna clinics across Mexico in 2024. Prevalence estimates were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and statistical comparisons were performed to assess differences by sex and age. Results: The overall prevalence of RE was 74.61% (95% CI:74.57-74.65) with 2841067 outpatients affected. Myopia was the most common condition, affecting 1,469,377 outpatients (38.6%, 95% CI: 38.54–38.64), followed by hyperopia (1,234,403 affected outpatients, 32.4%, 95% CI: 32.37–32.47) and astigmatism (1,205,400 affected outpatients, 31.7%, 95% CI: 31.61–31.71). Astigmatism was significantly more prevalent in males across all age groups (p < 0.001). Myopia and hyperopia showed similar prevalence between sexes during childhood and early adulthood, but diverged in later adulthood, with higher rates of myopia in males (p < 0.001) and hyperopia in females (p < 0.001). All three RE types exhibited a marked shift in prevalence in the 40–49 age group. Geographic variation was observed, with central states showing higher astigmatism and myopia prevalences rates whereas coastal states showed higher hyperopia prevalence rates. Notably, a large proportion of outpatients have never undergone an eye examination, indicating substantial gaps in access to care. Conclusions: This outpatient-based study provides critical insights into the epidemiology of RE in Mexico, revealing significant demographic and geographic disparities. The findings underscore the urgent need for targeted public health strategies to improve access to eye care services, particularly for underserved populations and high-risk age groups.

Keywords: Refractive Errors, Prevalence, Astigmatism, Myopia, Hyperopia

Received: 29 Jul 2025; Accepted: 09 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 García-Gil, Hernández-Jurado, Luna-Ruiz-Esparza, Espinoza-Angulo, Machado-Jímenez, Gómez-Campaña, Campos-Romero and Alcántar Fernández. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Jonathan Alcántar Fernández, jonathan.alcantar@salud-digna.org

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.