REVIEW article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1675946
Educational Interventions and Communication strategies to improve HPV immunisation uptake: A Systematic Literature Review
Provisionally accepted- 1Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- 2National center for global health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
- 3Department of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Italy
- 4European University of Technology EUt+, European Union, Cassino, Italy
- 5Department of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction. Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection represents a global health concern, causing approximately 627,000 cancer cases in women and 69,400 in men annually. Despite the proven value of HPV vaccines, disparities in vaccination coverage persist worldwide, highlighting the need for coordinated efforts to address vaccine acceptance and promote equitable access. To tackle this global challenge and align with the World Health Organization's (WHO) strategy to eliminate cervical cancer by 2030, implementing effective interventions to enhance knowledge within target populations is crucial to increasing vaccination uptake. This systematic review aimed to explore educational interventions and communication strategies employed by healthcare professionals (HCPs) to improve HPV vaccine coverage. Methods. A systematic literature review was conducted by querying three databases from July 2006 to July 2025. Eligible studies were systematic literature reviews (SLRs) and primary studies not included in SLRs, focused on international educational and communication strategies implemented by HCPs targeting the WHO-recommended populations for HPV vaccination, as well as parents and other influential stakeholders involved in vaccination decision-making. Results. A total of 17 studies were included, of which 6 SLRs and 11 primary studies, with 71% (12/17) focusing on educational interventions and 29% (5/17) on communication strategies. HPV vaccine-eligible individuals were targeted in 41% (7/17) of studies, while parents and other stakeholders in 59% (10/17). Narrative videos were the most common employed strategy (53%, 9/17), followed by written informative materials (35%, 6/17), social media (29%, 5/17), and person-to-person solicitation (23%, 4/17). Conclusions. The findings underscore the importance of tailored communication strategies to raise awareness and effectively engage diverse populations. Identifying strengths and gaps in current approaches is essential for creating evidence-based interventions that not only promote reliable information but also inform effective public health policies. Aligning these efforts with the WHO's call to action is crucial to maximizing the whole value of vaccination, reducing the global burden of HPV-related diseases, and advancing toward cervical cancer elimination by 2030.
Keywords: Human papillomavirus, cervical cancer, HPV vaccination, Educational intervention, Communication strategies, healthcare professionals, Vaccination coverage
Received: 29 Jul 2025; Accepted: 17 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 D'ambrosio, Sezzatini, Bucciardini, Maida, Nisticò, De Vito, Ricciardi, Boccia and Calabrò. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Romina Sezzatini, rominasez@libero.it
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.