Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Aging and Public Health

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1676970

This article is part of the Research TopicDigital Health Literacy as a Pathway to Better Mental Well-beingView all 10 articles

The mechanism of digital feedback on health information anxiety among older adults: information processing self-efficacy as a mediating variable

Provisionally accepted
Yang  ZhuYang Zhu1*Xin  WangXin Wang1Xiao  ZhangXiao Zhang2*Yan  LiYan Li3Yepeng  ChenYepeng Chen4
  • 1School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China
  • 2China Internet Network Information Center, Beijing, China
  • 3Chaoyang District Human Resources Public Service Center of Beijing Municipality, Beijing, China
  • 4School of Economics and Management, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Anhui, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background Digital feedback emerges as a significant variable influencing health information anxiety among older adults, and information processing self-efficacy also plays a crucial role in this process. This study aims to clarify the logical relationships among digital feedback, health information anxiety, and information processing self-efficacy. Methods Guided by the "hypothesis testing" paradigm, this empirical study was based on the construction of a mediation model to examine how digital feedback influences health information anxiety among older adults. Stratified random sampling in conjunction with probability proportional to size (PPS) sampling was used to survey a sample of 1713 older adults from 30 Chinese cities. Exploratory factor analysis, correlation analysis, causal steps approach, and the Bootstrap method were employed to test the mediating model. Mediation analysis was conducted using the PROCESS macro, and in-depth interviews were carried out to explore the underlying mechanisms of this process. Results The study found that digital feedback had a negative effect on health information anxiety among older adults (β=-0.396, p<0.001), while it had a positive impact on their information processing self-efficacy (β=0.700, p<0.001). Additionally, information processing self-efficacy had a negative effect on health information anxiety among older adults (β=-0.401, p<0.001). The analysis further revealed that the relationship between digital feedback and health information anxiety was partially mediated by information processing self-efficacy (β= -0.2806, SE = 0.0157, 95% CI =(-0.3115, -0.2503). Conclusions Digital feedback not only directly mitigates HIA among older adults but can also indirectly reduce health information anxiety by enhancing their information processing self-efficacy. It should be emphasized that inappropriate digital feedback from children, such as insufficiently thorough instruction or lack of patience, may exacerbate health information anxiety among older adults. Therefore, children should actively participate in the digital feedback process, demonstrate patience during feedback, and provide targeted assistance based on the actual needs of older adults. This approach can help older adults maintain their physical and mental well-being while better facilitating their integration into the digital society.

Keywords: Digital feedback, Information processing self-efficacy, Health information anxiety, Elderly Digital Divide, Mediating mechanism

Received: 31 Jul 2025; Accepted: 17 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhu, Wang, Zhang, Li and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Yang Zhu, zhuyang09@bupt.edu.cn
Xiao Zhang, zhangxiao@cnnic.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.