ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion
Association Between Mid-Upper Arm Circumference and Perceived Stress in Chinese adults and elderly: A Cross-Sectional Study
Provisionally accepted- 1Central China Normal University School of Physical Education, Wuhan, China
- 2Hubei Sports Vocational College, Hubei, China
- 3Faculty of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China
- 4Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Aims: This study aimed to explore the relationship between mid-upper arm circumference and perceived stress in Chinese adults and elderly. Methods: The present study employed cross-sectional data from the CHNS collected during the 2015 survey cycle, involving 8,455 adults and elderly respondents. Perceived stress was assessed utilizing the 14-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14), with scores dichotomized based on the median value. Logistic regression models adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, and lifestyle variables were applied to examine this associations. To further explore MUAC's potential as an individual-level indicator, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed. Results: Compared to participants in the lowest mid-upper arm circumference tertile, those classified within the highest tertile exhibited significantly lower odds of reporting high perceived stress (adjusted OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.71–0.93, P = 0.002). Subgroup analyses revealed that the inverse association between MUAC and perceived stress was more obvious among adult aged 60 years and older, suburban residents, non-smokers, participants with lower educational levels, and those in the western and northeastern regions. Sensitivity analyses also confirmed the robustness of these findings. The RCS analysis revealed a linear inverse association, with perceived stress declining notably when MUAC exceeded 32.23 cm. ROC analysis indicated that threshold values varied slightly across subgroups, ranging from 27.5–32.4 cm in males (AUC: 0.52–0.60) and 26.2–32.2 cm in females (AUC: 0.51–0.54), with higher values in participants with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² and slightly higher values in younger males. These findings suggest that MUAC has limited potential for identifying elevated perceived stress and should be regarded as exploratory rather than a validation of its screening utility. Conclusion: This study indicated that individuals with greater arm circumference tended to report lower stress levels in Chinese adults aged 60 years and older, suggesting exploratory evidence of MUAC's potential. However, its ability to discriminate perceived stress levels was limited, indicating that MUAC alone is not appropriate as an independent screening tool. It may serve as a simple, low-cost, and complementary indicator in population-based or resource-limited settings, pending further validation in longitudinal studies and integration with other anthropometric or psychosocial measures.
Keywords: Mid-Upper Arm Circumference, perceived stress, Cross-sectional study, adults, Elderly
Received: 05 Aug 2025; Accepted: 29 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Li, Ren, Bao and Yang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Duohong  Yang, 2218282344@qq.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
