Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Health Economics

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1681810

This article is part of the Research TopicTransforming Public Health Systems in Latin America: Challenges, Innovations and Sustainable SolutionsView all 3 articles

The accuracy and consistency of public health data in Brazilian information systems: identification of gaps and challenges to be faced in a municipality in the Amazon region

Provisionally accepted
Diego  SimeoneDiego Simeone1Andrea  LaranjeiraAndrea Laranjeira1Pedro M. R.  LopesPedro M. R. Lopes1Vytória C. S.  NogueiraVytória C. S. Nogueira1Daniele S.  SousaDaniele S. Sousa1Yago J.  MartinsYago J. Martins2,3Indira A. L.  EyzaguirreIndira A. L. Eyzaguirre2,3Marcus W. A.  CarvalhoMarcus W. A. Carvalho4Marcus Emanuel Barroncas  FernandesMarcus Emanuel Barroncas Fernandes3Aldemir B.  Oliveira-FilhoAldemir B. Oliveira-Filho5*
  • 1Afya Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Bragança PA, Brazil
  • 2Associação Sarambuí, Bragança PA, Brazil
  • 3Laboratório de Ecologia de Manguezal, Instituto de Estudos Costeiros, Universidade Federal do Pará, Bragança PA, Brazil
  • 4Departamento de Ciências Exatas, Centro de Ciências Aplicadas e Educação, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Rio Tinto PB, Brazil
  • 5Grupo de Estudo e Pesquisa em Populações Vulneráveis, Instituto de Estudos Costeiros, Universidade Federal do Pará, Bragança PA, Brazil

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

In Brazil, health conditions of public importance are notified by municipal health departments with a standardized flow using the Notifiable Health Conditions Information System (Sinan). This information goes through a process of consolidation and transfer to DataSUS, the national system that centralizes health information in Brazil. This study assessed whether there are quantitative differences between notified health conditions through the municipal system (Sinan) and those consolidated in the national system (DataSUS). This study was based on the municipality of Bragança, located in the eastern Amazon, which plays a strategic role due to its high annual number of notifications. To identify differences between the systems, we used data provided by Sinan and retrieved from DataSUS from 2019 to 2023. We tested the absolute loss in the number of notifications across years and health conditions between the two systems. Ethical approval was not required due to the anonymous nature of the data. Of the 19 health conditions identified and analyzed, 15 showed decreases between the systems, with losses reaching up to 91%. The largest discrepancies were observed for AIDS, syphilis in pregnant women, and dengue. Over the years, the loss was consistent, averaging approximately 42%. The differences observed between the two systems may have direct implications for the design, planning, and implementation of public health policies. Reducing these gaps urgently requires strategies such as the training of healthcare professionals, the revision of data flow processes, and investments in technologies that support system integration.

Keywords: epidemiologic surveillance1, data collection2, disease reporting3, Health Policy4, Sinan5, DataSUS6

Received: 07 Aug 2025; Accepted: 15 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Simeone, Laranjeira, Lopes, Nogueira, Sousa, Martins, Eyzaguirre, Carvalho, Fernandes and Oliveira-Filho. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Aldemir B. Oliveira-Filho, olivfilho@ufpa.br

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.