ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1682687
This article is part of the Research TopicEnhancing Public Health Workforce Competencies: AI Integration and Post-Pandemic Educational ReformsView all 12 articles
The effectiveness of Symptom-Oriented Mind Mapping Combined with Problem-Based Learning in Critical Care Clerkships: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Provisionally accepted- 1Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- 2The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 南京市, China
- 3The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy of Symptom-Oriented Mind Mapping combined with Problem-Based Learning (SOM-PBL) in intensive care unit (ICU) clinical clerkships, assessing its impact on medical students' knowledge integration, clinical decision-making efficiency, and procedural skills, thereby providing theoretical and practical insights for optimizing critical care medical education. Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial enrolled 160 fifth-year medical students during ICU clerkships at the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (January 2023–December 2024). Participants were randomly assigned to the SOM-PBL group (n = 80) or the control group (n = 80) using stratified randomization based on academic major and pre-clerkship academic performance. All students subsequently completed a four-week ICU clerkship using their assigned instructional method (SOM-PBL or traditional teaching), after which they underwent comprehensive assessments in theoretical knowledge, procedural skills, clinical reasoning, and educational satisfaction. Results: The SOM-PBL group achieved significantly higher median knowledge theoretical scores [median (IQR): 77 (73, 80) vs. 74 (72, 77); P < 0.05] and superior clinical reasoning performance [median (IQR): 88 (85, 93) vs. 87 (84, 89.75); P < 0.05]. No significant intergroup difference was observed in procedural skills performance [median (IQR): 92 (90, 94) for both groups; P = 0.938).SOM-PBL showed significant strengths in monitoring technology/device application, pathophysiology/disease recognition, and diagnostic cognitive rigor (all P < 0.05). Over 80% of SOM-PBL students rated ≥90% of survey items as 4 or 5 on a 5-point Likert scale, indicating high satisfaction with learning efficiency, engagement, clinical reasoning enhancement, and course quality. Conclusion: The study demonstrated that the SOM-PBL approach significantly enhanced medical students' knowledge integration and clinical decision-making efficiency during ICU clerkships. However, no significant improvement was observed in procedural skills. These findings offer both theoretical and practical value for innovating critical care medical education by effectively addressing knowledge fragmentation and bridging the theory-practice gaps.
Keywords: Problem-Based Learning, Mind mapping, critical care medicine, Clinical Clerkship, clinical reasoning
Received: 09 Aug 2025; Accepted: 15 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Gao, Zhao, Wang, Wang, Mao, Wang, Han, Xu, Qian, Yang, Yin, Wang and Yang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Wei Wang, wangwei60215_njmu@163.com
Xilan Yang, xilanyang@njmu.edu.cn
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.