Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Environmental Health and Exposome

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1685040

This article is part of the Research TopicInvisible Hazards, Lasting Impact: Airborne Toxicants and Systemic Disease from Environmental and Occupational ExposuresView all 4 articles

Multiple Chemical Sensitivity: An Italian Prevalence Multicentric Survey

Provisionally accepted
Giovanni  GenoveseGiovanni Genovese1Caterina Elisabetta  RizzoCaterina Elisabetta Rizzo1*Antonio  MistrettaAntonio Mistretta2Francesco  LeonforteFrancesco Leonforte3Raffaele  SqueriRaffaele Squeri1Carlo  SignorelliCarlo Signorelli4Cristina  GenoveseCristina Genovese2*
  • 1Università degli Studi Messina, Department of Biomedical, Dental and Morphological and Functional Imaging Sciences, Italy
  • 2Universita degli Studi di Catania Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche Chirurgiche e Tecnologie Avanzate GF Ingrassia, Catania, Italy
  • 3Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico G Rodolico San Marco, Catania, Italy
  • 4Universita Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS) is a multisystem environmental disorder triggered by exposure to chemical agents at concentrations below toxicological thresholds. Despite controversy surrounding its classification, MCS is increasingly recognized for its significant impact on health and quality of life. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence, symptomatology, and risk factors associated with MCS in the general population, using the Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory (QEESI) as a diagnostic tool. Methods: A multicenter retrospective study was conducted on 494 adults. Participants completed the QEESI questionnaire, and data were analyzed for clinical correlations, laboratory findings, environmental exposures, and socio-demographic characteristics. Results: The analysis revealed that 5.7% of the population exhibited symptoms compatible with MCS. Notably, 1.4% reported changes in work or residence due to receiving an allergic or rheumatologic diagnosis. Strong associations were identified between MCS-related symptoms and exposures such as food preservatives, colorings, Wi-Fi, and chemicals the condition: Symptom severity scoring was high in 15.8% of participants, while chemical intolerance was high in 86.4%. A total of 15.5% underwent further diagnostic evaluations, with 21.4% agents. Statistical analysis highlighted correlations between MCS symptom severity and variables such as chemical intolerance, hyperosmia, hypergeusia, and dermatological reactions. Risk profiling classified 10.73% of participants as highly suggestive of MCS. Conclusions: This study confirms the presence of MCS symptoms in 5.7% of the population and highlights that a significant portion, with 10.73% being classified as "very suggestive" and 40.4% as "moderately suggestive" of the condition, may be vulnerable to chemical exposures. The results support the need for standardized diagnostic protocols and multidisciplinary approaches to management.

Keywords: Multiple Chemical Sensitivity, Environmental intolerance, QEESI, chemicalexposure, Hypersensitivity, Epidemiology, Preventive Medicine

Received: 13 Aug 2025; Accepted: 19 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Genovese, Rizzo, Mistretta, Leonforte, Squeri, Signorelli and Genovese. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Caterina Elisabetta Rizzo, caterina.rizzo93@gmail.com
Cristina Genovese, crigenovese@unime.it

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.