ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health Policy
This article is part of the Research TopicImpact of Governance and Cultural Diversity on the Effectiveness of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions During PandemicsView all articles
Navigating Distrust and Competing Priorities during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Insights from Florida to Strengthen Cooperation
Provisionally accepted
Rachel N Waldman1*
Anicca Liu1,2Johnathan H Duff1Bonnie E Deal3
Jacob N Batycki1Abhirami Sriganeshan1Ernesto A Pretto4Jorge Saavedra5José Szapocznik1- 1University of Miami Department of Public Health Sciences, Miami, United States
- 2University of Pennsylvania School of Social Policy & Practice, Pennsylvania, United States
- 3University of Miami School of Communication, Coral Gables, United States
- 4University of Miami Department of Anesthesiology, Miami, United States
- 5AHF Global Public Health Institute, Fort Lauderdale, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Stopping an infectious disease outbreak relies on a coordinated set of actions across public and private institutions and the wider public. However, cooperation with public health recommendations was notably hindered during the pandemic by widespread distrust in science and government and the notion that public health competed with other priorities. This study aims to examine the factors driving distrust and competing priorities in Florida, and potential pathways to overcome these issues. Methods: We conducted an additional analyses of qualitative data from our original study involving 25 semi-structured interviews with Florida stakeholders from government, academia, and the private sector. We employed a deductive-inductive approach to qualitative content analysis, using themes from the initial study as a guiding framework while allowing for the emergence of additional insights. Results: Interviews revealed that inadequate transparency and data availability, politicization, and poor communication were perceived as undermining public trust in science and decision-makers during COVID-19. The economy and individual rights were discussed as priorities competing against public health during the pandemic. Objectives for building trust and balancing priorities included five essential areas: transparency, representation, communication, education, and balance. Discussion: These challenges and objectives reflect the need for a reimagined approach to public health policy and practice—one that is rooted in trust and respect for diverse value systems. By leveraging core collective values that cut across political ideologies, we may mitigate polarization and perceived stigmatization to build a more culturally resonant public health practice.
Keywords: Public health1, Covid-192, distrust3, competing priorities4, cooperation5, adherence6, compliance7, cultural competence8
Received: 14 Aug 2025; Accepted: 27 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Waldman, Liu, Duff, Deal, Batycki, Sriganeshan, Pretto, Saavedra and Szapocznik. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Rachel N Waldman, r.waldman@med.miami.edu
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.