Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Digital Public Health

This article is part of the Research TopicHealth Data EquityView all articles

Evaluation of Health Equity Frameworks in Telehealth and Digital Health: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis

Provisionally accepted
Siyu  WangSiyu Wang*Anagha  KilledarAnagha KilledarAmy  Von HubenAmy Von HubenSarah  NorrisSarah NorrisAndrew  WilsonAndrew Wilson
  • The University of Sydney, Leeder Centre for Health Policy, Economics & Data, Sydney, Australia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: The rise of telehealth and digital health solutions has been promoted as transformative approaches to bridging healthcare access gaps. However, these technologies may introduce new disparities related to digital literacy, internet access, and technology affordability. While several health equity frameworks exist for traditional healthcare delivery, their applicability to telehealth contexts remains unclear. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Scopus databases for peer-reviewed articles discussing health equity frameworks relevant to telehealth and digital health. A narrative synthesis approach was employed, complemented by a tailored quality appraisal assessing clarity, theoretical basis, comprehensiveness, and telehealth applicability. Framework elements were categorized into drivers, measures, and enablers/modifiers of health equity. Results: The search yielded 707 records; after removing 25 duplicates, 27 full-text articles were assessed and 17 were included in the final synthesis. Thirteen unique health equity frameworks were identified. Six frameworks were explicitly developed for digital health, telehealth, or eHealth contexts, while seven were general health equity frameworks with potential applicability to telehealth. Eight frameworks demonstrated moderate-to-high quality scores. Across frameworks, notable gaps remain in addressing telehealth-specific challenges and in providing actionable guidance for real-world implementation. Conclusion: Existing frameworks provide valuable insights but require adaptation to fully address telehealth-specific challenges. Tailored frameworks that incorporate digital determinants of health, prioritize equitable technology access, and facilitate system integration are essential. These advancements will enable telehealth to effectively reduce health disparities and advance equity in healthcare access.

Keywords: determinants of health, Digital Health, health equity, Healthcare Disparities, healthequity frameworks, telehealth, Telemedicine

Received: 21 Aug 2025; Accepted: 12 Dec 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Killedar, Von Huben, Norris and Wilson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Siyu Wang

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.