ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Health Economics
Comparative study: Mapping treatment costs, best practices, and challenges across Africa
Provisionally accepted- 1Siemens Healthcare, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- 2Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany
- 3Siemens Healthcare, Cairo, Egypt
- 4Siemens Healthcare, Midrand, South Africa
- 5Siemens Healthcare, Gurugram, India
- 6Johns Hopkins University, Maryland, United States
- 7Regent Business School, Durban, South Africa
- 8Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This paper presents the findings of the Siemens Healthineers SHIFT Innovation Think Tank Pan-Africa Capacity Building Program, which aims to improve access and affordability of healthcare across Africa through knowledge sharing and the transfer of best practises. The study focuses on comparing the cost of treating liver cancer, lung cancer, coronary artery disease (CAD), and stroke in different African countries. These conditions represent a major and growing share of the noncommunicable disease burden across the African continent. They are also strategic focus areas for Siemens Healthineers due to their high clinical impact, complex diagnostic requirements, and the significant health system resources needed for effective management. These diseases serve as suitable proxies for assessing broader access challenges because they require timely detection, advanced imaging, laboratory diagnostics, specialized treatment pathways, and long-term follow-up care. Any gaps in diagnostic capacity, equipment availability, clinical workflow efficiency, workforce skills, or financing structures become immediately visible along these patient pathways. Comparing the differences with the best practises and challenges of each country, the programme aims to facilitate cross-cultural learning to bridge the gap between high-and low-value treatments. The study draws on detailed data on medical expenditure in several African countries, including public and private health services. Cost differences are analysed taking into account medical procedures, drugs, diagnostic tests and hospital costs. In addition, the factors contributing to these cost variations, including healthcare delivery, resource availability, regulatory framework, and socio-economic factors, examined to develop standardised strategies to reduce medical costs and improve overall health outcomes. The results of this study will be a valuable resource for policy makers, healthcare providers and stakeholders to identify areas for improvement and take targeted actions. Ultimately, the aim is to improve access, affordability and quality of healthcare across Africa and ensure that life-saving treatments are readily available and affordable for all people on the continent.
Keywords: Pan-Africa, Treatment cost, Infrastructure & Access to Care, Comparative studies, liver cancer, lung cancer, Coronary artery disease (CAD), stroke management
Received: 21 Aug 2025; Accepted: 20 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Mehdi, Sinha, Haider, Kandil, Ferrari-Stanford, Qwabe, Hassan, Shehadah, Vasavada, Mahmeen, Jarso, Parag, Mzurikwao and Sunguya. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Ankitesh Sinha, ankiteshkumar.sinha@siemens-healthineers.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
