ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Aging and Public Health
This article is part of the Research TopicThe Costs of Caring for Older AdultsView all 11 articles
Caring alone: elder care burdens, practices, and structural imbalances among China's one-child generation
Provisionally accepted- 1School of Public and Management, Guangxi University, Nanning, China
- 2Chongqing Polytechnic Institute, Chongqing, China
- 3School of Law, Guangxi University, Nanning, China
- 4School of Law, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Between 1980 and 2015, China's one-child policy reshaped family structures. Now, as this generation enters adulthood and their parents age, the only children face the daunting challenge of supporting multiple elderly parents in an increasingly aging society. Purpose: This study focuses on the practical challenges and needs faced by China's one-child generation in caring for their aging parents. By examining their caregiving experiences, the study aims to reveal the multiple pressures they bear and to provide policy-and system-level insights for alleviating the elder care burden on this unique generation. Method: This study is a qualitative analysis based on content from social media. A grounded theory analysis of online discussions was conducted using NVivo 14.0 (QSR International). Focusing on questions such as "What happens as the parents of one-child families grow old, and who will ensure their care?", our study systematically gathered and coded discussions from Zhihu, a major social media platform in China. Results: The Chinese only children in this study's sample face intense elderly care pressures, including economic strain, labor shortages, and emotional exhaustion. They struggle to balance caregiving with career development while shouldering dual pressures of supporting both elderly parents and young children. Structural inequalities—such as the gap between government promises and actual social security, and disparities between urban and rural areas, as well as within and outside the formal system—worsen the challenge. At the same time, the weakening of traditional filial piety deepens cultural and psychological strains, further fragmenting intergenerational caregiving responsibilities. Discussion: Research indicates that the issue of elderly care for parents of only children in the sample requires not only the reconstruction of a fairer and more sustainable elderly care ethic across society but also urgent institutional efforts to promote more inclusive and equitable support for elderly care and medical services. Meanwhile, the sample observations indicate that the development of technology and the establishment of a high-quality, affordable eldercare service system will become important pathways to easing the caregiving pressure of the one-child generation and providing greater social support.
Keywords: China, One-child per couple policy, Only children, Aging, elder careburdens, qualitative research, grounded theory
Received: 28 Aug 2025; Accepted: 17 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Xiang, Xiang, Ren and Deng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Qiao Ren, renqiao@gxu.edu.cn
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.