ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Mental Health
This article is part of the Research TopicInnovative Value-Based Medicine: Lessons From China’s and APAC’s Healthcare Evolution, Volume IIView all 7 articles
An Evaluation of Outpatient Satisfaction in Chinese Tertiary Hospitals from a Patient-Centred Perspective: A Cross-Sectional Study
Provisionally accepted- 1The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- 2Guangdong Polytechnic, Foshan, China
- 3Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- 4University of Greenwich, London, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: As a key indicator of healthcare service quality in Chinese tertiary hospitals, patient satisfaction measurement requires multidimensional assessment. However, existing tools predominantly focus on clinical efficiency while neglecting humanistic dimensions such as emotional support and personalized care. This oversight renders them inadequate to address contemporary patients' growing expectations for holistic, patient-centred care (PCC) experiences. Objective: This study aims to develop a patient-centred evaluation system for measuring outpatient satisfaction in Chinese tertiary hospitals. Methods: We surveyed 2,664 patients from three outpatient departments of tertiary hospitals in Guangzhou using a validated self-developed questionnaire assessing overall satisfaction (satisfied/not satisfied) and four domains: outpatient environment, outpatient process, PCC, and hospital services. The sample was randomly and equally split for exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA/CFA) to identify and validate satisfaction dimensions. A weighted satisfaction score was derived, with model robustness tested through binary Logistic regression and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: Overall satisfaction was reported by 43.39% of respondents, with significant variation by age (χ²= 10.615, P=0.014) and inverse correlation with waiting time (χ²=44.989, P=0.001). EFA results indicated good internal consistency (KMO=0.912; Bartlett's test P<0.01), with all four domains showing significant positive correlations (P<0.01). PCC emerged as the strongest contributor (26.19%), followed by hospital services (17.62%), outpatient process (16.95%), and outpatient environment (8.79%). CFA revealed key indicators: environmental safety (SMC=0.751), waiting order management (SMC=0.820), physician-patient relationship (SMC=0.929), and doctor's diagnosis and treatment (SMC=0.819). The weighted satisfaction score significantly predicted overall satisfaction (B=3.244, P<0.01), with ROC analysis confirming good predictive validity (AUC=0.771, P<0.01). Conclusion: This study establishes the first validated patient-centred satisfaction evaluation system for Chinese outpatient care, identifying PCC and hospital services as key determinants of satisfaction. The findings provide an evidence-based framework for optimizing healthcare delivery and informing policy reforms to better address patients' evolving expectations in tertiary hospital settings.
Keywords: doctor–patient relationship, factor analysis, Outpatient satisfaction, Patient-centred care (PCC), tertiary hospitals
Received: 04 Sep 2025; Accepted: 15 Dec 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Yutao, Yongyi, Dandan, Yanling, Kaitong, Bo, Lijun, Yang and Qin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Ma Lijun
Yajun Yang
Cao Qin
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
