ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health Policy
This article is part of the Research TopicChanging Healthcare through Innovation in Clinical Management and Healthcare Policy Strategies: Focus on Quality Improvement for the PatientView all 15 articles
Patient Safety Culture Assessment in Five Public Hospitals of Sichuan Province: A Cross-Sectional Study with HSOPSC 2.0
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Obstetric Nursing, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- 2Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background:Patient safety is a core issue in the medical field, influenced by patient safety culture (PSC). Research on PSC in southwestern China remains insufficient. Methods:This study is a cross-sectional survey. A convenience sample of healthcare workers from 5 hospitals in Sichuan Province was surveyed during January to March 2025. The Chinese version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture 2.0 was used to assess participants' perceptions of PSC. SPSS 22.0 was used for data analysis, including descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, t-tests, and ANOVA. Thematic analysis addressed open-ended comments. Results:This study collected 468 valid questionnaires. Among the participants, the majority were female (91.2%) and nurses (80.3%). The overall average positive response rate for PSC was 69.4%. 5 dimensions were identified as strengths, with positive response rates ranging from 75.4% to 83.4%: “Communication about error”, “organizational learning-continuous improvement”, “team work”, “support for patient safety”, and “handoffs and information exchange”. In contrast, 4 dimensions required improvement (positive response rates: 51.5%–71.2%), including “staffing and work pace”, “response to error”, “reporting patient safety events”, and “communication openness”. Notably, the positive response rate for “reporting patient safety events” was 53.1%, which was significantly lower than the 76.0% reported by AHRQ in 2024. Univariate analysis demonstrated statistically significant associations between safety culture scores and several variables, including working hours per week, work unit, adverse event reporting frequency, and self-reported overall patient safety ratings (P<0.05). Qualitative analysis of open-ended comments identified seven primary themes, emphasizing the need for improvements in staffing levels, workload management, and administrative support. Conclusions:Our study reveals that the patient safety culture among healthcare professionals in Sichuan Province is at a moderate level, has not reached the expected standard. Notably, there exist significant gaps in critical domains, such as patient safety events reporting, when compared with developed regions, which underscores the imbalance in medical safety concepts across different regions. Future efforts should focus on establishing non-punitive reporting and learning mechanisms, optimize the allocation of human resources and clinical workflows, and ultimately foster a more robust and advanced PSC.
Keywords: Patient safety culture, HSOPSC2.0, Hospital, Safety events, China
Received: 12 Sep 2025; Accepted: 28 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Li, Peng, Gu, Fu and Tang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Wenjing Fu
Fangmei Tang
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
