ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Infectious Diseases: Epidemiology and Prevention
A Mixed-Methods Study on Healthcare Workers' Perceptions of Treatment Adherence Among HIV-TB Co-infected Patients in a Multi-disease Prevention Policy Context
Provisionally accepted
- 1School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences Wuhan, Wuhan, China
- 2University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
- 3Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
- 4Liangshan Prefecture Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Xichang, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background Integrated service models aim to improve HIV–tuberculosis (TB) comorbidity management, yet little is known about how frontline providers perceive adherence challenges under China's Integrated Prevention and Control of Four Diseases (IPC4D) policy. This mixed-methods study explored healthcare workers' assessments of adherence, perceived barriers, and policy effects in Liangshan Prefecture—a high-burden, resource-limited, multi-ethnic region. Methods Between May and June 2025, an online survey of 492 healthcare workers and 30 in-depth interviews were conducted. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and ordinal logistic regression (odds ratios [ORs], 95% confidence intervals [CIs]); qualitative data underwent thematic analysis. Results Overall, 64.0% of respondents rated patient adherence as "good" or "very good," yet intermittent medication use (50.4%), unsupervised discontinuation (43.7%), and missed follow-ups (37.8%) remained common. Key perceived barriers included low health literacy (86.8%), regimen complexity (62.8%), side effects (61.2%), financial burden (59.8%), and limited family support (52.2%). Female respondents were less likely to report high adherence (OR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.36–0.91), while clinicians (OR = 2.67, 95% CI: 1.35–5.31) and those in infectious disease departments (OR = 2.38, 95% CI: 1.23–4.64) reported more favorable assessments. Standardized adherence assessment correlated with lower reported adherence (OR = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.09–0.28), whereas institutional efforts to reduce financial burden were linked to higher adherence (OR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.02–3.11). Qualitative findings highlighted persistent stigma, socioeconomic barriers, and mixed experiences with IPC4D implementation. This is a provisional file, not the final typeset article Conclusion Healthcare workers recognize IPC4D's value in improving coordination and access but report enduring multilevel barriers. Strengthening policy impact requires standardized adherence monitoring, socioeconomic support, workforce development, and culturally sensitive patient education.
Keywords: HIV-TB co-infection, Treatment Adherence, multi-disease prevention policy, Healthcare workers, mixed-methods
Received: 16 Sep 2025; Accepted: 17 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Bi, Dou, Pei, Jike, Yu, Wang and Zheng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Ruili Bi, annaicoon@gmail.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.