Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Infectious Diseases: Epidemiology and Prevention

Rapid Diagnosis of Acute HIV-1 Infection Cases: First real-world performance of point-of-care HIV-1 nucleic acid testing in China

Provisionally accepted
Mingzhu  NiuMingzhu Niu1Xiaoqin  XuXiaoqin Xu2Yuhua  ShiYuhua Shi3Xin  ZhangXin Zhang4Peng  GuanPeng Guan1Yu  WangYu Wang4Lijuan  DongLijuan Dong3Huichao  ChenHuichao Chen3De-Sheng  HuangDe-Sheng Huang5*Cong  JinCong Jin4*
  • 1Department of Epidemiology, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
  • 2Department of HIV/STD Prevention and Control, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China
  • 3Yunnan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Kunming, China
  • 4National Center for AIDS STD Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
  • 5Department of Mathematics, China Medical University, Shenyang, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Timely diagnosis of acute HIV infection (AHI) is critical for curbing transmission. However, the diagnostic window prior to antibody development limits the utility of conventional serological assays. Conventional laboratory-based nucleic acid testing (LABT) is often hindered by operational complexity and long turnaround times. Point-of-care nucleic acid testing (POCT) provides a rapid alternative. Methods: This multicenter cross-sectional study enrolled 1,829 adults from 13 cities in Jiangsu Province and Kunming, Yunnan Province, who had reactive screening results but negative or indeterminate Western blot outcomes. The diagnostic accuracy, quantitative correlation, and agreement of the POCT (Xpert® HIV-1 Viral Load point-of-care test) were compared with LABT using the Roche COBAS TaqMan v2.0 or Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assays, with follow-up seroconversion serving as the reference standard. Turnaround time from initial screening to NAT result reporting was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Laboratory staff perceptions of POCT usability were evaluated via questionnaire. Results: Using follow-up seroconversion as a reference, POCT demonstrated a sensitivity of 98.87% and specificity of 100.00%, with almost perfect agreement with LABT (99.76%, Cohen's κ=0.994). Quantitative viral load results exhibited strong correlation between POCT and LABT (r=0.89), with 94.64% of paired measurements falling within the limits of agreement. POCT significantly reduced the median time from initial screening to result reporting compared to LABT (7 vs. 14 days, p<0.001) and increased the likelihood of results being returned within 7 days (Hazard Ratio=2.29, p<0.001). Most laboratory personnel reported ease of use (30/33, 90.9%) and a preference for the POCT workflow (21/33, 63.6%). Conclusions: The Xpert HIV-1 POCT provides a highly accurate and rapid alternative to LABT for diagnosing AHI in China. Its implementation can dramatically shorten diagnostic delays, potentially reducing loss to follow-up and onward transmission, thus offering significant value within the national HIV diagnostic framework.

Keywords: acute HIV infection, Point-of-care testing, Viral Load, diagnosticperformance, Turnaround time

Received: 17 Sep 2025; Accepted: 26 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Niu, Xu, Shi, Zhang, Guan, Wang, Dong, Chen, Huang and Jin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
De-Sheng Huang
Cong Jin

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.