ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion
This article is part of the Research TopicPharmacists at the Frontline of Public Health: Workforce Training, Community Campaigns, and Integrated Patient CareView all articles
Standardizing Hospital Pharmacy Practice in Home Hospitalization: Results from a Multidisciplinary Delphi Consensus in Spain
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Gregorio Marañón Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- 2Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Gregorio Maranon, Madrid, Spain
- 3Hospital Gregorio Marañón. Unidad de Hospitalización a Domicilio, Madrid, Spain
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction The expansion of Home Hospitalization (HH) services has prompted the need for standardized pharmaceutical care models to ensure safe and efficient medication management in the home setting. However, Hospital Pharmacy (HP) departments are often heterogeneously involved in HH programs, and there is a lack of consensus on their roles and responsibilities. The objective was to develop a consensus-based activity dashboard to guide HP departments in implementing standardized pharmaceutical care within HH units in Spain. Methods A modified Delphi method was conducted in five phases: constitution of a coordinating group, definition of candidate activities, selection of a national expert panel, evaluation of the list of activities (two-round consensus process), and analysis of the results. Experts rated the necessity and feasibility of implementing 44 proposed activities by a HP department, using a 9-point Likert scale (in total, 88 items were rated). Activities were included in the final dashboard if ≥75% of panelists rated both dimensions in the 7–9 range. Results Twenty-three multidisciplinary experts participated in the Delphi panel. Consensus was achieved for 60 of 88 evaluated items (68.2%), with 17 activities rated as both necessary and feasible for inclusion in the final dashboard. These activities spanned six domains: drug dispensing, clinical pharmacy care, risk management, communication and patient education, home administration of antineoplastic agents, and clinical research. Several activities were rated as necessary but lacked feasibility consensus, highlighting systemic and resource-based limitations. Conclusion This study provides the first structured consensus on pharmaceutical care activities in HH in Spain, resulting in a practical dashboard to guide HP departments. Its implementation may facilitate the harmonization of care models, optimize medication safety, and support the growing role of pharmacists in home-based care. Addressing feasibility barriers is essential to fully realize the potential of pharmaceutical care in HH programs.
Keywords: Home Care Services, Home hospitalization, hospital pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Services, Patient Safety, Delphi Technic
Received: 22 Sep 2025; Accepted: 04 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Somoza-Fernández, de Lorenzo-Pinto, Escudero-Vilaplana, Manrique-Rodriguez, Villanueva-Bueno, Martín-Barbero, Redondo-Galán, Calatayud-García, González-Ramallo, Herranz-Alonso and Sanjurjo-Sáez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Vicente Escudero-Vilaplana, vicente.escudero@salud.madrid.org
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
