Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion

Exploring the implementation and theory of a school-based diet and active lifestyle intervention among primary school children

Provisionally accepted
Cindy Mei Jun  ChanCindy Mei Jun Chan1Falk  Müller-RiemenschneiderFalk Müller-Riemenschneider1,2Michael  ChiaMichael Chia3Mary Foong-Fong  ChongMary Foong-Fong Chong1,4*Zoe Jane-Lara  HildonZoe Jane-Lara Hildon1
  • 1Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
  • 2Center for Digital Health, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • 3Physical Education & Sports Science Academic Department, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
  • 4Institute for Human Development and Potential, Agency for Science Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Guided by Kincaid's ideation metatheory, the Promoting hEalthy Diet and Active Lifestyle (PEDAL), a school-based intervention, was developed. The central tenets of ideation consist of three psychosocial domains (cognitive, emotional, and social) that are assumed to influence behavior cumulatively. This study explored the implementation of two components of PEDAL and how ideation factors influenced diet and active lifestyle behaviors. Methods: Following the conduct of two out of four intervention components (a series of interactive in-class lessons and actionable home activities), six focus group discussions were conducted with students (n=16) and teachers (n=7). Audio-recorded data were extracted as expanded notes and analyzed using the applied thematic analysis, with theme generation framed by the ideation metatheory. Results: While students enjoyed the lessons and home activities, they hoped that lessons could be more physically active. Teachers found lessons easy to implement but struggled with time constraints. Students reported gaining a better understanding of sedentary behaviors and habit formation through the lessons. However, they faced barriers, such as COVID-19 movement restrictions and the lack of autonomy at home, which impeded their opportunities to engage in more physical activity and healthier eating. Regarding ideation, students discussed cognitive factors that motivated behavior change, such as attitudes towards healthier behaviors and image concerns. Emotional factors, including the enjoyment of activities, influenced students' motivation to engage in healthy eating and physical activity. Some students also reported resistance to further changes when they felt they were already "doing too much". Social factors, such as family involvement, were critical but often limited. Conclusions: The findings have illuminated several crucial aspects of enhancing intervention implementation, supported the use of the ideation metatheory to underpin the PEDAL intervention, and guided the subsequent evaluation of the whole intervention. This study was retrospectively registered with the ISRCTN registry [ISRCTN16114046].

Keywords: healthy eating, sedentary behavior, School-based intervention, ideation metatheory, qualitative study

Received: 19 Sep 2025; Accepted: 27 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Chan, Müller-Riemenschneider, Chia, Chong and Hildon. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Mary Foong-Fong Chong

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.