Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Infectious Diseases: Epidemiology and Prevention

This article is part of the Research TopicMathematical Modelling and Data Analysis in Infectious DiseasesView all 6 articles

Epidemiological Trends and Determinants of Mumps Outbreaks: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Provisionally accepted
Dr Ritik  AgrawalDr Ritik Agrawal1Tanveer  RehmanTanveer Rehman1*Deepti  SinhaDeepti Sinha1Poulomee  ChakrabortyPoulomee Chakraborty1Manikandanesan  SakthivelManikandanesan Sakthivel2Dewesh  KumarDewesh Kumar3Srijeeta  MitraSrijeeta Mitra1Afeeq  KarumathilAfeeq Karumathil1Srikanta  KanungoSrikanta Kanungo1Sanghamitra  PatiSanghamitra Pati1
  • 1ICMR - Regional Medical Research Centre Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, India
  • 2ICMR - National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, India
  • 3Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, India

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Despite widespread vaccination programs, mumps has resurged globally. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the epidemiological characteristics, attack rates (ARs), and complications of mumps outbreaks worldwide from 2004 to 2024. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Google Scholar for studies reporting on mumps outbreaks. Confirmed mumps cases, defined by WHO criteria, were included across all age groups. Epidemiological characteristics were summarized using the Time-Place-Person format. Pooled ARs and complication rates were calculated using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses examined variations by age, region, vaccination status, and outbreak period. A random-effects meta-regression and leave one out sensitivity analysis was used to explore the influence of study-level characteristics heterogeneity in the attack rate among mumps outbreak studies. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran’s Q and I², and publication bias was evaluated with funnel plots and Egger’s test. Results: A total of 47 studies from 21 countries reporting 71,174 mumps cases, were included in the systematic review, with 30 studies in the meta-analysis. The pooled AR of mumps outbreaks was 14.5% (95% CI: 12.91–16.11), with adults having the highest AR (31.8%). The pooled complication rate was 10.3% (95% CI: 5.7–14.9), with orchitis being the most common complication (63.1%). Temporal trends showed peaks during 2004–2009 and 2016–2020, while regional analysis revealed higher ARs in the Americas (29.2%) and Eastern Mediterranean (28.8%) regions compared to Europe (7.6%) and South-East Asia (9.6%). Among vaccinated individuals, ARs were highest with a single dose (35.7%) and lowest with three doses (10.1%). Conclusion: Mumps outbreaks remain a global concern due to waning vaccine-induced immunity. Incorporating a third MMR booster dose into vaccination schedules is recommended, particularly for high-risk groups, to reduce ARs and complications effectively. Trial registration: This review was registered with PROPSPERO (CRD42024572629)

Keywords: Attack rate, MMR vaccine, Mumps, outbreak, Vaccination

Received: 23 Sep 2025; Accepted: 05 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Agrawal, Rehman, Sinha, Chakraborty, Sakthivel, Kumar, Mitra, Karumathil, Kanungo and Pati. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Tanveer Rehman, drtanveerrehman@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.