Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Disaster and Emergency Medicine

Impact of an Emergency Department Bypass Referral Pathway for Surgically Managed Type A Aortic Dissection Diagnosed at Non-Aortic Centers

Provisionally accepted
Zhixiang  CaiZhixiang Cai1,2*Ben  ZHANGBen ZHANG1Xianyue  WANGXianyue WANG1Weida  ZHANGWeida ZHANG1Jinxia  ZHANGJinxia ZHANG1Hulin  WANGHulin WANG3Tao  YANTao YAN1
  • 1People's Liberation Army General Hospital of Southern Theatre Command, Guangzhou, China
  • 2Hunan University of Medicine, Huaihua, China
  • 3The 925th Hospital of Chinese PLA Joint Logistics Support Force, Guiyang, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Surgical outcomes for Type A aortic dissection (TAAD) are significantly improved at high-volume aortic centers. Notably, approximately 60% of TAAD cases treated at these centers are referrals from outside hospitals, with nearly half presenting in an unstable condition upon arrival. To address critical delays in this population, our institution, in collaboration with the Chest Pain Center, implemented a regional Direct Bypass Protocol (DBP) in April 2019. This 24/7 pathway allows patients diagnosed with acute aortic syndrome at non-aortic centers to bypass the emergency department (ED) and proceed directly to surgical care. This study evaluates the impact of the DBP on surgical outcomes for TAAD patients diagnosed at non-aortic centers. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed medical records of TAAD patients diagnosed at non-aortic centers and transferred to our hospital for surgery between January 2018 and December 2023. Clinical outcomes before and after DBP implementation were compared. Results: The study included 144 patients in the Routine Referral Group and 149 in the Emergency Bypass Group. The two groups were well matched for demographics and comorbidities. Compared to the Routine Referral Group, the Emergency Bypass Group had a significantly shorter time from hospital arrival to surgery (8 hours vs. 4 hours, P < 0.001) and a higher rate of total arch replacement procedures (84.0% vs. 91.3%, P = 0.059). In-hospital mortality was lower in the Emergency Bypass Group (18.8% vs. 10.7%, P = 0.053). After propensity score matching, both 30-day mortality (12.5% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.031) and in-hospital mortality (15.2% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.056) were significantly reduced in the Emergency Bypass Group. The median hospital stay was also shorter post-matching (16 days vs. 17 days, P = 0.003). There was no significant difference in postoperative complication rates between the groups. Cox regression analysis showed that implementation of the DBP was associated with a reduced risk of mortality (P = 0.002, hazard ratio = 4.546, 95% CI: 1.721–12.004). Conclusion: A coordinated, point-to-point referral model between the Chest Pain Center and the Aortic Center integrating streamlined pre-hospital triage and a dedicated aortic surgical team significantly improves outcomes for TAAD patients diagnosed at non-aortic centers.

Keywords: Type a aortic dissection, TAAD Diagnosed at Non-Aortic Centers, Direct Bypass Protocol, Emergency Transfer Pathway, surgical outcomes

Received: 04 Oct 2025; Accepted: 13 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Cai, ZHANG, WANG, ZHANG, ZHANG, WANG and YAN. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Zhixiang Cai, 897988958@qq.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.