Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Public Mental Health

This article is part of the Research TopicRedefining Acute Psychiatric Care: Strategies for Improved Inpatient Experiences, vol IIView all articles

A multidisciplinary expert consensus on optimal acute adult psychiatric inpatient care in Hong Kong

Provisionally accepted
Dennis Chak Fai  MaDennis Chak Fai Ma1Kit Ping  ChanKit Ping Chan2Janelle  YorkeJanelle Yorke1Grace Wing Ka  HoGrace Wing Ka Ho1Wai Ching  YanWai Ching Yan3Chi Wing  LawChi Wing Law4Wai Song  YeungWai Song Yeung5Tarun  BastiampillaiTarun Bastiampillai6Adrian  P MundtAdrian P Mundt7Sherry Kit Wa  ChanSherry Kit Wa Chan8*
  • 1School of Nursing, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, SAR China
  • 2Kwai Chung Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR China
  • 3Department of Psychiatry, Kowloon Hospital, Kowloon, Hong Kong, SAR China
  • 4Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR China
  • 5Department of Psychiatry, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR China
  • 6Flinders University College of Medicine and Public Health, Adelaide, Australia
  • 7Universidad Diego Portales Facultad de Medicina, Santiago, Chile
  • 8Department of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine School of Clinical Medicine, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction The number of psychiatric inpatient beds has been significantly decreased since the deinstitutionalisation movement began in the 1950s. Subsequent efforts have largely focused on developing psychiatric services based on community mental health models. However, optimal clinical care standards require minimum inpatient care capacities and effective integration between inpatient and community psychiatric care. Methods To establish the optimal number of psychiatric inpatient beds and factors related to optimal adult psychiatric inpatient care in Hong Kong, an online, two-round Delphi survey was used to collect expert opinions from experienced psychiatric nurses, a social worker, and psychiatrists working in public psychiatric inpatient or community settings. Medians and interquartile ranges were calculated for numeric responses. Thematic analysis was used to qualitatively categorise the themes of contextual factors for optimal bed numbers and optimal inpatient care. Expert consensus was reached after two rounds of the online survey according to priori consensus definitions. Results In total, 47 experts were invited to participate. 29 participated in the panel of the first round and 22 in the second round of the Delphi study. 68% had > 20 years post-registration experience. Expert consensus revealed an optimal median number of 68 psychiatric inpatient beds per 100,000 population (interquartile range = 11) and a nurse-patient ratio of 1:4. Two themes were identified relating to recommendations for psychiatric inpatient bed numbers and three themes relating to optimal acute adult psychiatric inpatient services in Hong Kong, respectively. One theme relating to optimal bed numbers was the presence of service needs in the population, such as the prevalence of severe mental illnesses and substance use disorders. Conclusions Experts in Hong Kong reached consensus on the need for more psychiatric beds than currently available to achieve a balanced care system. This study also presents consensus on a nurse-inpatient ratio that would require investments in more staff and has the potential to improve the quality of inpatient treatment and efficiency of care.

Keywords: General adult psychiatry, optimal psychiatric inpatient care, Psychiatric beds, expert consensus, Delphi study

Received: 06 Oct 2025; Accepted: 26 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ma, Chan, Yorke, Ho, Yan, Law, Yeung, Bastiampillai, Mundt and Chan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Sherry Kit Wa Chan

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.