Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Disaster and Emergency Medicine

This article is part of the Research TopicImplementation Science for Disaster Preparedness and Emergency MedicineView all 5 articles

Expanding the Reach of a Fall Prevention Intervention for Older Adult Emergency Department Patients through Telehealth: A Trial Protocol

Provisionally accepted
Audrey  KelemanAudrey Keleman1,2Megan  BoundsMegan Bounds3William  MundoWilliam Mundo3Jonathan  Gomez PicazoJonathan Gomez Picazo3Meredith  MealerMeredith Mealer2Sunny  LinneburSunny Linnebur4Bucky  FerozanBucky Ferozan5Julie  DunnJulie Dunn6Jennifer  Stevens-LapsleyJennifer Stevens-Lapsley1,2Elizabeth  GoldbergElizabeth Goldberg3*
  • 1Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, United States
  • 2Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, United States
  • 3Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, United States
  • 4Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, United States
  • 5Department of Emergency Medicine, UCHealth Northern Colorado, Fort Collins, United States
  • 6Trauma Center, UCHealth Medical Center of the Rockies, Loveland, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Falls are a leading cause of emergency department (ED) visits among older adults, yet many patients are discharged without a clear understanding of their fall risk factors or access to timely prevention services. The Geriatric Acute and Post-Acute Fall Prevention (GAPcare) intervention has demonstrated efficacy in reducing fall-related ED revisits by addressing these factors during the ED visit. Still, its reliance on in-person specialists limits scalability to smaller and lower-resourced EDs. Methods: This study outlines a protocol for adapting GAPcare into a telehealth-enabled model (e-GAPcare) using a two-phase implementation science approach. Phase 1 engages ED staff, patients, and caregivers in structured workgroups to guide the adaptation of telehealth while preserving core intervention components. Phase 2 involves a single-arm trial at one ED with 40 older adults presenting after a fall, evaluating feasibility and acceptability. The intervention includes remote consultations with a pharmacist and physical therapist, tailored assessments to address individual fall risk factors, and a standardized checklist integrated into discharge planning that is shared with primary care clinicians. Outcomes: Data will be collected through surveys and electronic health records over a 6-month follow-up period. Trial outcomes include usability, care transition quality, healthcare utilization, and uptake of recommendations. Conclusion: By leveraging hospital-based telehealth infrastructure and eliciting end-user perspectives on needed adaptations, e-GAPcare aims to extend the reach of evidence-based fall prevention programs to smaller EDs or those that lack in-person pharmacists and physical therapists.

Keywords: falls, Fall prevention, adaptations, telehealth, Remote, emergency department, rural

Received: 08 Oct 2025; Accepted: 30 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Keleman, Bounds, Mundo, Gomez Picazo, Mealer, Linnebur, Ferozan, Dunn, Stevens-Lapsley and Goldberg. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Elizabeth Goldberg

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.