ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Infectious Diseases: Epidemiology and Prevention
This article is part of the Research TopicStrengthening Health Systems to Prevent, Detect and Respond to Future Pandemics: Innovative Approaches for Implementing National Action Plans for Health Security in Tropical Countries and BeyondView all 6 articles
Assessing the Correlation Between STAR Health Risk Forecasts with Actual Health Emergencies in West and Central Africa: A Three-Year Analysis
Provisionally accepted
- 1WHO Afro, Dakar, Senegal
- 2Texila American University, Georgetown, Guyana
- 3World Health Organization, Nairobi, Kenya
- 4Universite des Montagnes, Bangangte, Cameroon
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This study evaluates the Strategic Tool for Assessing Risks (STAR), developed by the World Health Organization (WHO), for its effectiveness in predicting public health emergencies across West and Central Africa during the period 2022–2024. STAR applies a composite risk scoring system based on four dimensions likelihood, severity, vulnerability, and coping capacity to classify hazards such as measles, cholera, and meningitis into five risk categories ranging from Very Low to Very High. Using a retrospective observational design, the study integrates quantitative outbreak data with qualitative assessments of preparedness actions across nine countries. The analysis demonstrates that STAR's predictive accuracy varies significantly by hazard and context. Meningitis forecasts were consistently accurate, primarily due to the disease's strong seasonality and well-established epidemiological patterns in the African meningitis belt. In contrast, predictions for measles and cholera were less reliable, influenced by fluctuating immunization coverage, socio-political instability, and environmental factors such as water and sanitation conditions. Case studies illustrate these discrepancies: Burkina Faso's cholera risk was overestimated, resulting in zero reported cases despite a high-risk classification, while Guinea's measles outbreak closely matched STAR's high-risk prediction. The findings also highlight that effective preparedness measures, including vaccination campaigns, hygiene promotion, and cross-border coordination, can mitigate high-risk scenarios, as observed in Gabon and Burkina Faso. Key themes emerging from the analysis include STAR's strength in forecasting predictable hazards and its limitations due to static inputs and low geographic granularity. While STAR is not a statistical forecasting model, its participatory, multi-sectoral approach provides strategic value by guiding planning, prioritization, and resource allocation for health emergency preparedness. It enables countries to optimize limited resources, prioritize high-risk hazards (scores 16–25), and implement preventive actions. Recommendations for improvement include recalibrating scoring parameters, integrating real-time surveillance and climate data, enhancing seasonality modeling, and increasing geographic resolution. When combined with dynamic data systems and collaborative efforts, STAR remains a critical strategic tool for strengthening regional public health resilience and supporting WHO's Health Emergency Framework and all-hazards preparedness planning
Keywords: emergency preparedness, occurrence, prediction, Risk Assessment, STAR Tool
Received: 24 Oct 2025; Accepted: 11 Dec 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 YOTA, MASSIDI, Talisuna and TCHIKAMGOUA. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Daniel YOTA
Chrostian Eric MASSIDI
Ambrose Talisuna
Omer Njajou TCHIKAMGOUA
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.