Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Life-Course Epidemiology and Social Inequalities in Health

Healthcare utilization and preventive care among social housing residents compared to the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada: A population-based cohort study

Provisionally accepted
Gina  AgarwalGina Agarwal1*Homa  KeshavarzHoma Keshavarz1Ricardo  AngelesRicardo Angeles1Melissa  PirrieMelissa Pirrie1Francine  MarzanekFrancine Marzanek1Francis  NguyenFrancis Nguyen2Jasdeep  BrarJasdeep Brar1J.  Michael PatersonJ. Michael Paterson1,2
  • 1McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
  • 2ICES, Toronto, Canada

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: To examine disparities in influenza vaccination and screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers among adults living in social housing compared to the general population of Ontario, Canada, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A population-based cohort study was conducted using linked administrative health data from Ontario, Canada. We studied individuals aged 18 and older who were alive on January 1, 2020. Social housing sites were identified using the 2023 cycle of the Social Housing of Ontario Registry. The complement cohort comprised adults not residing in social housing. Receipt of influenza vaccination and screening for cervical (Pap test), breast (mammography), and colorectal (FIT/FOBT/sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy) cancers were analyzed using data from the Ontario Breast Screening Program, Ontario Cancer Registry, Ontario Health Insurance Plan Database, and Primary Care Population Database. Age-standardized rates and rate differences between the social housing population and complement cohort were compared for the pre-COVID-19 (2018 and 2019) and COVID-19 (2020 and 2021) periods. Results: The social housing cohort included 297,644 individuals, while the complement cohort had 11,386,078 individuals. The social housing cohort had higher proportions of older adults (≥60 years) and females. Age- and sex-standardized disparities in influenza vaccination (≥1 dose in 2-year period) between social housing residents and the complement cohort widened during the COVID-19 pandemic from -0.30% to -1.84%, with the largest gaps observed among adults aged 80 and older. While age- and sex-standardized disparities in breast and cervical cancer screening narrowed, they remained significant. In contrast, the age- and sex-standardized disparity in colorectal cancer screening increased from -7.42% to -9.69%, particularly among males and older adults aged 60–74. Discussion: Disparities in healthcare utilization and preventive care between social housing residents and the complement cohort persisted or widened during the COVID-19 pandemic, most notably for influenza vaccination and colorectal cancer screening. Narrowing of some screening disparities was primarily attributed to overall declines in screening rates rather than improved access. These findings emphasize the need for targeted, equity-focused public health strategies to improve access to preventive healthcare services for socially and economically disadvantaged populations.

Keywords: administrative health data, cancer screening, COVID-19, health equity, influenza vaccination, Preventive Health Services, Social housing

Received: 21 Oct 2025; Accepted: 04 Dec 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Agarwal, Keshavarz, Angeles, Pirrie, Marzanek, Nguyen, Brar and Paterson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Gina Agarwal

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.