ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Mental Health
This article is part of the Research TopicYouth Mental HealthView all 21 articles
Psychometric Validation and Determination of Minimal Clinically Important Differences for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in Adolescents with Myopia
Provisionally accepted
- 1Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
- 2Affiliated Eye Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Myopic adolescents face multiple psychological challenges, including anxiety, depression, and social isolation, necessitating multidimensional assessment. One such assessment tool is the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), though it has not yet been validated in this specific population. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability, validity, responsiveness, and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the SDQ in this specific population. Methods: Following the consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) guidelines, we conducted a psychometric evaluation combining cross-sectional and longitudinal designs among 307 adolescents with myopia (including newly diagnosed and follow-up cases). Baseline assessments evaluated feasibility, reliability (internal consistency and test-retest stability), and validity (construct and discriminant validity). Follow-up surveys after myopia correction were used to assess responsiveness and establish the MCID using anchor-based methods. Results: The SDQ demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.71) and good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.73). Construct validity was supported by strong correlations between problem-related subscales (peer problems, hyperactivity/inattention, conduct problems, emotional problems) and difficulty scores (r = 0.51–0.72, P < 0.001), with moderate-to-strong correlations for total SDQ scores (r = 0.36–0.75, P < 0.001). Discriminant validity was confirmed by significant differences in prosocial behavior (P < 0.01). While responsiveness was modest (effect size [ES] = -0.26, standardized response mean [SRM] = -0.28), the MCID was determined to range between 2.00–2.38 points, with a threshold of 2 points recommended for group-level discrimination. Conclusions: The SDQ is a reliable and valid tool for assessing psychological well-being in adolescents with myopia. The established MCID of 2 points enhances its clinical utility for screening and monitoring mental health changes in this population.
Keywords: Myopia, Mental Health, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire(SDQ), psychometrics validation, Minimum Clinically Important Difference(MCID)
Received: 22 Oct 2025; Accepted: 10 Dec 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Yang, Yin, Hu, Yu, Lai, Sun, Bi and Wu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Hongsheng Bi
Jianfeng Wu
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.