COMMUNITY CASE STUDY article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion
This article is part of the Research TopicExploring Community-Driven Public Health: Participatory Action Research ApplicationsView all 6 articles
Elevating Lived Experience in Overdose Prevention: A Community Case Study of Arizona's Overdose Data to Action Community Advisory Board
Provisionally accepted
- 1Arizona Department of Health Services, Phoenix, United States
- 2The University of Arizona, Tucson, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Drug overdose remains a leading cause of preventable death in the United States, with persistent inequities among populations that often face stigma and barriers to care. Traditional evaluation models often exclude people with lived and living experience (PWLE) of substance use from meaningful decision-making. Methods: To address this, the Arizona Department of Health Services (ADHS) implemented a community-based participatory evaluation model within its Overdose Data to Action in States (OD2A-S) program by establishing a Community Advisory Board (CAB). The CAB was designed to integrate lived experience into evaluation planning and interpretation, identify community-driven priorities, and guide program improvement. Members were recruited statewide through a nomination process and compensated. A licensed clinical social worker facilitated meetings using trauma-informed and healing-centered approaches. Participatory methods such as journey mapping and logic model development enabled members to translate personal and community experiences into actionable evaluation questions. Results: Between August 2024 and August 2025, the CAB met quarterly to prioritize evaluation of naloxone vending machines and peer navigation models. Members identified key barriers, including stigma, rural access, transportation, and lack of culturally responsive care, and provided input on equitable evaluation tools and communication strategies. A composition survey confirmed strong representation of individuals in recovery (86%) and people of color (88%), though rural and tribal, medically assisted treatment, and veteran perspectives remain limited or not represented. Discussion: Early lessons demonstrate that compensated, trauma-informed engagement fosters trust, accountability, and practical insights that strengthen evaluation quality and relevance. Challenges include administrative delays in payment, limited generalizability due to small membership, and the need for sustainable funding to expand representation. Conclusion: Arizona's OD2A-S CAB provides a replicable model for integrating lived experience into state-level overdose prevention. By positioning PWLE as co-evaluators rather than participants, this model advances equity, builds system trust, and strengthens the translation of data into action.
Keywords: advisory boards, Community, community participatory evaluation, Drug Overdose, people with lived and living experience
Received: 29 Oct 2025; Accepted: 10 Dec 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Celaya, Wadhera, Wilcox and Orso. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Martin F Celaya
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.