In the published article, there was an error in affiliation 1. Instead of “Bioethics Department, El Bosque University, Bogotá, Colombia”, it should be “Bioethics Department, Bioethics, Life Sciences Research Group, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia”.
In the published article, there was an error in affiliation 2. Instead of “School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Del Rosario University, Bogotá, Colombia”, it should be “School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Medical and Health Sciences Education Research Group, Bogotá, Colombia”.
In the published article, there was an error in affiliation 5. Instead of “Department of Bioethics, El Bosque University, Bogotá, Colombia”, it should be “Bioethics Department, Bioethics, Life Sciences Research Group, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia”.
In the published article, there was an error in affiliation 7. Instead of “Medical, El Bosque University, Bogotá, Colombia”, it should be “Medical, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia”.
In the published article, there was an error. error in the translation of a sentence: “In this sense, algorithms can be a part of groups of incontrovertible decision-making rules (uncritical/normative character)”.
A correction has been made to 2 AI and the RCT: the conversion of values into data, paragraph 12. This sentence previously stated:
“In this sense, algorithms can be a part of groups of incontrovertible decision-making rules (uncritical/normative character.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“In this sense, algorithms depict a set of incontrovertible decision-making rules (uncritical/normative character).”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Statements
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
echo chamber, artificial intelligence, filter bubble, decision-making, algorithmic reasoning, rational choice theory
Citation
Pinto-Bustamante BJ, Riaño-Moreno JC, Clavijo-Montoya HA, Cárdenas-Galindo MA and Campos-Figueredo WD (2023) Corrigendum: Bioethics and artificial intelligence: between deliberation on values and rational choice theory. Front. Robot. AI 10:1251568. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1251568
Received
01 July 2023
Accepted
05 July 2023
Published
18 July 2023
Approved by
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland
Volume
10 - 2023
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Pinto-Bustamante, Riaño-Moreno, Clavijo-Montoya, Cárdenas-Galindo and Campos-Figueredo.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Boris Julián Pinto-Bustamante, borisjpinto@gmail.com
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
‡These authors have contributed equally to this work
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.