Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Robot. AI

Sec. Field Robotics

Food's Future: Sustainability and Agricultural Robotics

Provisionally accepted
Sindiso  Mpenyu NleyaSindiso Mpenyu Nleya1*Siqabukile  NdlovuSiqabukile Ndlovu2Mthulisi  VelempiniMthulisi Velempini3
  • 1Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Biotechnology, University of Limpopo, Private Bag X1106, Sovenga 0727, Polokwane, South Africa,, Polokwane, South Africa
  • 2National University of Science and Technology Faculty of Engineering, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe
  • 3University of Limpopo, Mankweng, South Africa

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The global food system is under increasing pressure from population growth, climate change, resource constraints, and persistent food loss. These challenges undermine food security and threaten progress toward long-term sustainability goals set by international organizations. Addressing them requires concrete, forward-looking innovations aligned with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly Goal 2, which aims to eliminate hunger. This paper explores how agricultural robotics can support the transition to more resilient and sustainable food systems, especially where traditional practices are no longer sufficient. It integrates perspectives from technology, sustainability, and policy to link global priorities with local realities. Our discussion is organized around five interconnected dimensions. First, a crisis-framing perspective illustrates why food system reform has become urgent and how current pressures correspond with SDG objectives. Second, we present a simple taxonomy that classifies agricultural robots by domain and function while noting ongoing technical challenges such as interoperability. Third, we examine the integration of robotics with precision agriculture, Internet of Things platforms, artificial intelligence, and big data systems. Together, these technologies enable more autonomous field operations and support faster, data-driven decision making. The fourth dimension evaluates the environmental, economic, and social implications of agricultural robotics. Potential benefits include reduced chemical use, improved water efficiency, enhanced soil health, more efficient labor allocation, and expanded employment opportunities in rural and remote regions. Finally, we review global case studies from developed contexts such as Australia and the United States and emerging economies including Brazil, India, and China. Across these settings, agricultural robotics consistently improve productivity, reduce waste, and promote more efficient resource use. These gains contribute not only to farm-level outcomes but also to broader environmental stewardship and socio-economic development. Despite this promise, widespread adoption remains challenging. High upfront costs, limited technical capacity, interoperability issues, and ethical concerns surrounding data governance and automation continue to impede progress. Overcoming these barriers is essential for realizing the full potential of robotics in reshaping global food systems and advancing a more sustainable future.

Keywords: Agricultural robotics, artificial intelligence, Automation, Climate resilience, Food security, precision agriculture, Resource optimization, sustainability

Received: 31 Aug 2025; Accepted: 12 Dec 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Nleya, Ndlovu and Velempini. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Sindiso Mpenyu Nleya

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.