ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sociol.
Sec. Work, Employment and Organizations
Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2025.1681829
This article is part of the Research TopicOvercoming (in)visible Barriers: Gender, Work and DiscriminationView all 7 articles
Managing gender diversity and barriers to inclusion: Lived experiences of women employees in a South African coal mining company
Provisionally accepted- 1Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, South Africa
- 2University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa
- 3Tshwane University of Technology - eMalahleni Campus, Emalahleni, South Africa
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
ABSTRACT Introduction: In the context of growing global commitments to workplace diversity and inclusion, South Africa's mining sector remains a site of persistent gender inequality. Despite policy frameworks informed by liberal feminist ideals that emphasise equal rights, representation, and opportunity, women continue to experience structural and cultural barriers that hinder their advancement. This study addresses the urgent need for context-sensitive, experience-based approaches to understanding gender inequality in male-dominated industries. Methods: A qualitative, interpretive phenomenological design was employed to explore the lived experiences of twelve purposively selected women working in various departments at a coal mining company in Mpumalanga. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to capture how these women navigate hostile workplace environments characterised by sexual harassment, gender stereotyping, unsafe working conditions, and limited access to leadership pathways. Thematic analysis was applied using Braun and Clarke's six-step framework. Results: The findings revealed persistent structural and cultural barriers that undermine formal diversity initiatives. Participants' narratives emphasised issues of limited career advancement, biased recruitment practices, exclusionary workplace cultures, safety risks, and difficulties balancing work and family responsibilities. While liberal feminist-informed policies such as the Employment Equity Act and Women in Mining initiatives have formalised inclusion, entrenched patriarchal norms often render such reforms symbolic rather than substantive. Discussion: These findings highlight the limitations of surface-level reforms and underscore the need for deeper institutional change. Meaningful gender diversity can enhance collaboration, innovation, and workplace morale, but these benefits remain unrealised without stronger policy enforcement, inclusive organisational cultures, mentorship, gender-sensitive recruitment, safe reporting mechanisms, and targeted support for women's professional development. This research provides practical guidance for re-evaluating current diversity strategies and calls for a shift from symbolic inclusion to structural transformation within South Africa's mining industry.
Keywords: gender diversity, Liberal feminism, mining industry, organisational culture, South Africa, Women in mining, workplace inequality
Received: 07 Aug 2025; Accepted: 20 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Baker, Ngonyama-Ndou and Skosana. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Thulile Lillian Ngonyama-Ndou, engonytl@unisa.ac.za
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.