ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sociol.

Sec. Medical Sociology

Doctor Performance Drivers: Insights from Various Theoretical Perspectives

  • Petra Christian University, Surabaya, Indonesia

Article metrics

View details

148

Views

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract

The increasing need to improve patient outcomes alongside the rise in healthcare costs, influenced by an aging population and continuous technological progress, makes digital transformation in healthcare essential. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of technology implementation is strongly dependent on the acceptance of healthcare professionals. This study examines how self-efficacy, perceived job insecurity, and the intention to use technology contribute to physician performance and innovation process outcomes. Drawing from established theories such as Innovation Diffusion Theory and self-efficacy theory, a comprehensive model is developed to explore these relationships. Data were collected through a structured survey involving healthcare professionals and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. The results show that self-efficacy significantly encourages technology adoption, which in turn enhances both innovation and physician performance. Contrary to assumptions, perceived job insecurity does not significantly influence the intention to adopt technology but has a direct negative impact on physician performance. This research contributes to the existing literature by offering an integrated multi-theoretical framework that combines TAM, Innovation Diffusion Theory, self-efficacy, and job insecurity. Unlike earlier studies, it examines both direct and indirect effects and finds that job insecurity may not be a critical obstacle to technology use. The study also includes insights from primary care physicians, a group often underrepresented in digital health research.

Summary

Keywords

Technology Adoption, Physician performance, self-efficacy, healthcare innovation, Perceived job insecurity

Received

18 June 2025

Accepted

26 January 2026

Copyright

© 2026 Apsari, Devie and Tarigan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Suci Utami Apsari

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Share article

Article metrics