ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sociol.
Sec. Medical Sociology
On the importance of intersectionality: understanding how experienced, anticipated and internalized stigma intersect in people with non-normative identities
Elise Wuyts 1
Kaat Schellen 1
Violette Coppens 2
Wim Huys 3
Alana Schuerwegen 3
Samuel Coenen 4
Kris Goethals 3
Manuel Morrens 1,2
1. University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
2. University Department of Psychiatry, Duffel, Belgium
3. University Forensic Center, Edegem, Belgium
4. Centre for General Practice, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Introduction Recent years have seen a growing body of work on sexual and gender minority groups, as well as a rising interest in the diversity of relationship structures, both sexual and romantic. The increased visibility and associated counter-movement also impact the stigmatization to which these minority groups are subjected. This is in turn correlated with increased minority stress which has been linked to numerous mental, physical and economic problems. The overlap found between these different minority groups underlines the importance of understanding the complex interplay of stigmatizing factors through the lens of intersectionality. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Belgium in the Dutch language to compare four non-normative groups (sexual orientation, gender identity, sexual relationships and romantic relationships) with each other. Three different scales were used, yielding four stigma scores: 1) the experienced stigma scale, 2) the anticipated stigma scale with two subscores of 2a) anticipated stigma in daily life and 2b) anticipated stigma in relationships, and 3) internalized stigma scale. Results A total of 2,576 were included in analyses, of which 519 individuals (20%) identified as non-normative, with 425 belonging to only one category. All of the minority groups included in this study experienced stigmatization because of their non-normative identity, though differences were found in the type of stigma they experienced and the extent to which they experienced stigma compared to the other non-normative groups. Having multiple non-normative identities resulted only in increased anticipated stigma. Discussion The results found in this study are comparative to other research. Differences in stigmatization may be explained by differences in visibility and stigma symbols, with some identities being more concealable than others, and differences in societal acceptance in Belgium. The current political landscape underlines the importance of this research, which addresses the need to examine combinations and the interactions between different types of stigma and different non-normative identities.
Summary
Keywords
BDSM, consensual non-monogamy, Intersectionality, LGBTQIA+, Stigma & Awareness
Received
11 July 2025
Accepted
20 January 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Wuyts, Schellen, Coppens, Huys, Schuerwegen, Coenen, Goethals and Morrens. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Elise Wuyts
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.